1. We have added a Gift Upgrades feature that allows you to gift an account upgrade to another member, just in time for the holiday season. You can see the gift option when going to the Account Upgrades screen, or on any user profile screen.
    Dismiss Notice

But the Native Americans had no concept of land ownership.

Discussion in 'Civ5 - General Discussions' started by civhawaii, Sep 26, 2010.

  1. civhawaii

    civhawaii Chieftain

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Messages:
    50
    So why cant we just take it from them? :crazyeye:

    Silly Iroquois.
     
  2. Maniacal

    Maniacal the green Napoleon

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2005
    Messages:
    18,778
    Location:
    British Columbia, Canada
    They do in Civilization, things developed differently in this alternate reality. Also untrue, they had land they claimed was their tribe's and territory. They just didn't have individual landholders afaik.
     
  3. MadRat

    MadRat Cheese Raider

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2008
    Messages:
    598
    Location:
    Under the sink
    Please dont turn this forum into a political a troll.

    Mod please lock/del this thread.

    Rat
     
  4. Agent327

    Agent327 Observer

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2006
    Messages:
    16,073
    Location:
    In orbit
    That´s basically what happened, isn´t it?

    Not quite. Land couldn´t be bought, i.e. they didn´t have an economic concept of land ownership. But land could be fought over, so you might state they had a political concept of land ownership.
     
  5. Yushal

    Yushal Chieftain

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2004
    Messages:
    91
    No. We had to kill them for it. See? Civ is so realistic!
     
  6. knug

    knug Chieftain

    Joined:
    May 17, 2010
    Messages:
    35
    these are the Futurama natives, from mars. They DO have concept of ownership
     
  7. frekk

    frekk Scourge of St. Lawrence

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2003
    Messages:
    3,151
    Location:
    Kingston, Ontario
    They certainly did have concepts of property ownership, just not European concepts of private property ownership.

    Tribes held land and defended it to the death - they understood collective ownership quite well.

    Usufructory right to property was also understood. A family that had been hunting or farming a particular tract had rights to do so exclusively, especially among the agrarian groups like the Iroqouis. They use the land, therefore, it is theirs to use - exclusively.

    European property concepts are more complex. One could own land not only without ever having used it, but perhaps without ever having seen it. One could transfer ownership, perhaps to someone who is not physically using the land and never will. One could divide the bundle of property rights - and grant right of use or habitation for a fee (ie rent) while retaining ownership.

    All of this was largely incompatible with native ways of thinking about property, because right derived from use, not from a saleable deed issued by authority of a sovereign government.
     
  8. Krzowwh

    Krzowwh Chieftain

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2009
    Messages:
    784
    Location:
    California
  9. bernlin2000

    bernlin2000 Chieftain

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2010
    Messages:
    305
    Location:
    Florida
    I don't think America did from 4000BC until...the 1600s? :lol: I like seeing Native Americans build an empire: they more than deserve the opportunity to cut American down to size :)
     
  10. Drake L. Dragon

    Drake L. Dragon Chieftain

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2010
    Messages:
    128
    Now, I believe that historical and political context and concepts should be applied to Civilization V, but history and politics do need to be applied correctly or just not at all. Even when the whites usurped Native American land, they acknowledged that the Native Americans did indeed own that land -- they just believed that Native Americans were wasting that land without private ownership or an agricultural system that was on the same scale as the one emerging in Europe, New England, and the South at the beginning of the 1600s. For those reasons, we can see why Communists always keep going back and pointing out the Native American story as a counterexample against Capitalism, but nobody ever said that Native American tribes never actually existed -- or else there wouldn't have been any wars or conflicts within Native American groups, now, would there?
     
  11. Yushal

    Yushal Chieftain

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2004
    Messages:
    91
    Ishkaditaly-ottenbotten-bobo-badittendotten-watantotten-shhhhhhh
     

Share This Page