lumpthing
generic lump
Do you have a web-page up for your project or some-such?
no we've decided to do it without a website. We just scraped it out on rock.
Do you have a web-page up for your project or some-such?
. However it's all invitation-only at the mo. There's more info about it on this thread than on the current public face of the site.lumpthing said:I don't think that's true. For a start, most OTs are not angry political discussions. Secondly, even the political discussions are not just purposeless venting.
Avoid spam?GoodGame said:They are just for venting on miscellany to avoid spam in the main forums.

Avoid spam?![]()
Like a roach motel, we check in and are not spamming in the Civ forums! See OT works. We aren't sabotaging honest Civ4 mod development or strategic discussions, by not turning Free Religion vs. Organized religion or Communism vs. Free Market civics with poli-sci, or existence of god debates.Like a roach motel, we check in and are not spamming in the Civ forums! See OT works. We aren't sabotaging honest Civ4 mod development or strategic discussions, by not turning Free Religion vs. Organized religion or Communism vs. Free Market civics with poli-sci, or existence of god debates.
That's not spam, that's driving threads off topic. They're very different things.
However you cut it or quibble it, that's why there's OT.
I never knew that. Thank you for enlightening me.I think you simply ignored or didn't pay attention to the more controversial political threads on this forum. Granted, there is less right-out youtube-level idiocy (although we've gotten a couple new posters who're at that level) but it's still angry political juvenility. Most attacks are more subtle, but it's still all there.
For me as a woman it's boring to read all the political fuss going in there, but other topics make up for it.
I'd be interested in your project - please PM me when finished.
Yes, you can truly say that CFC OT are a real crowd of mass debaters.
My project is all about how to mass debate without creating a big mess. I've taken to calling it mass-participation debate.this thread contains not enough poland.

Rather than only including useful posts and throwing away not-useful posts, it just makes the structure of the discussion much easier to quickly absorb like looking at a contents page in a book so you can just get to the bits you're interested in and ignore the rest. There's also a bit of voting going on to highlight recommended posts. I know that's not very clear; I should probably have waited till I'm at liberty to be less mysterious before posting this thread.I like the idea. The multi-quote function is not perfect for large threads, and it is a hassle to trawl through many pages of half-spam in order to find interesting points.
How would you decide what's useful and what is not?
Anyone else noticed that the quality of discussion here is much higher than on other sites?
