Sid Meier is Canadian. It is a travesty that Canada has not been represented yet.
It's hard to imagine any unique characteristics for Canada that don't involve a joke.
If Canada is added, they need to include an option to turn certain Civs off. I would get annoyed if I had Canada in my games. It would kill my immersion. I can take the U.S. serious since it was/is a serious world power, but Canada isn't unique or powerful in any particular way that deserves inclusion. If it was included, it would be simply to appease the fans.
This kind of option would be welcome at any rate. It would be nice to be able to an exclusion list so that you can have, say, a game with only ancient/classical civilizations, while still having some surprise as to which civilizations you'll meet.If Canada is added, they need to include an option to turn certain Civs off.
My feelings about the inclusion of Canada as a civ are a bit like with Switzerland. They sure are powerful nations with proud histories, but I feel -- and please do not take any offense -- they're just too bland for a game like Civilization.
I'd prefer Canada to be represented by the Cree or some other indigenous people.
My feelings about the inclusion of Canada as a civ are a bit like with Switzerland. They sure are powerful nations with proud histories, but I feel -- and please do not take any offense -- they're just too bland for a game like Civilization.
I'd prefer Canada to be represented by the Cree or some other indigenous people.
I hope not. Too many modern civs as it is. Actually, this makes me think: I'd love to see a feature where you can tell the game not to consider certain civs in random selection--that way, those of us like myself who aren't a fan of more modern civs can disable civs like America and Brazil, but those who still want them can have them.
I wouldn't be opposed to seeing Canada as DLC, though.
Where do you draw a line for a "modern" civ? One could argue that Indonesia is not at all a "modern" civ. Poland has existed for over 1000 years now, too. Where does "modern" start?Too many modern civs as it is.
Where do you draw a line for a "modern" civ? One could argue that Indonesia is not at all a "modern" civ. Poland has existed for over 1000 years now, too. Where does "modern" start?
This attitude that old things are best and modernity has nothing to offer is ridiculous, though.
This. Selection of civilizations should be to improve gameplay, not to satisfy the nationalism of regional players.No, I hope to see more ancient and medival (or exotic, unknown, forgotten) civs. They are more interesting to me.
This attitude that old things are best and modernity has nothing to offer is ridiculous, though.
Not the best, but a lot more climatic, gamey, exotic, interesting etc. Ancient civs or medival civs are more "tasty".