That is an accurate assessment of my resources, yes.
I have 1 brick, 4 wood, 3 wheat.
Wanting to vote is fine. The issue, largely, is that voting and guns are identical if not for the ores. If I'm right, there are 8 ores in play. Evan has 3, Punchy has 2, Gamez has 1, and you have 1.
Evan's are forfeit. Punchy's are being stolen, if not both then probably one of them. That'll give Gamez 2 or 3 ores.
The solution to the gun problem would be to distribute them so that nobody has more than 1 ore. Better yet, we can vest up a few people.
We've got 5 sheep and 5 wheat in play. (Using Marcher's last spreadsheet, N3. Keep in mind this spreadsheet is inaccurate, as it uses my pre-vest resource count, so it may not have accurate tallies for others. It does not take into consideration D4's daily resource gen or Bianca's peek/vest.)
I have 2 sheep, you have 1, Bianca has 2.
Csargo has 3 wheat, Bianca has 2.
Who do we protect? Do we use my previous post as the foundation, wherein we don't protect Bianca and Gamez? Would they agree to that? Can we trust Gamez to vest himself instead of buying a gun? (e.g., if he says he stole only 1 ore, but he actually stole 2.)
@Arakhor, can you confirm that you have 6 brick, 1 ore, and 1 sheep?
@GamezRule, can you confirm that you have 1 wood, 1 ore, and 8 sheep? Can you tell us what your resources are after your steals go through?
@Csargo, what are your current resources?
@Marcher Jovian, same Q to you. (I don't expect a surprise here given your reported claim.)
My current resources: 4 brick, 3 wood, 2 sheep.
If only one person dies tonight, we'll start D5 at an assumed 4/2 ratio. We would have to hit another wolf with the D5 lynch or vote not to lynch anyone (which the mafia will be against) and hope that only one person dies on N5 too, because otherwise we'll have lost long before Bianca can give another result on D6.
Plan 2 is highly implausible, but do we even have the resources for Plan 1?
If we ensure that no one has bricks, wood and ore, then no one can purchase a gun, but of course that's also uncomfortably to the bricks and wood needed to vote and we can all but guarantee that a liability like Punchy will pretend to vote and instead shoot someone the following night.
To cover absolutely everyone? No. But we don't need to cover Evan (7), don't need to cover Punchy (6), and reasonably don't need to cover Bianca (5). With 5 wheat, 5 sheep, and 3-4 ores in play, we can vest at least 3 of the remaining 5.
Punchy can't shoot anyone N5 if he's the lynchee D5.
Well, if you gave me only one wheat to buy a vest, if I then channelled wheat/sheep into another ore, I'm still short the wood I'd need for a gun. You'd then have to either rely on me correctly voting to burn up that wood or refuse to entertain my wood offer, leaving me disenfranchised.
So, the safest thing to do is not to give me any wood at all, but is there really any point to someone being alive if they're deliberately being made vote-less (except to stop the scum from winning by parity)?
Thank you!
Thanks! That matches up exactly with what Marcher's spreadsheet would imply for D4.
What do both of you think about the two proposed plans? Which do you find most preferable? Or neither?
1. Vesting everyone N4.
2. Propping Bianca up for another peek/vest N5 while someone else vests her N4.
We're also getting really close to that time when we can't rely simply on gut reactions to work out who to lynch, so it would probably be a good idea if we laid out who exactly we trust and don't trust and go from there.
Should I just unvote and save the resources for more votes tomorrow if things go bad?