Cause of Lou Gherigh's Disease Discovered

Joined
Apr 21, 2004
Messages
4,695
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/748453?src=ptalk

Might require registration.

Essentially, the disease is genetic with a mutation in a gene coding for ubiquilin-2, a protein of uncertain function that may repair misshapen proteins within cells. It is thought that a defect with ubiquilin-2 causes neuronal cells to die as certain of their proteins become dysfunctional as a result.

Spoiler :

Scientists have found that mutations in the ubiquilin-2 gene, as well as abnormal accumulation of the ubiquilin-2 protein, can cause amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and ALS/dementia.

"We've defined a new pathology in ALS patients involving ubiquilin-2 protein, which has never been seen before," senior study author Teepu Siddique, MD, a neuroscientist at Northwestern's Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, Illinois, noted in an interview with Medscape Medical News. "When we extend these pathologic studies to all of ALS and ALS/dementia, we see the same pathology in the brains and spinal cords of these patients," he added.
Dr. Teepu Siddique

"Not only have we defined a new cause that seems to be operative in all of ALS, but also we have now shown that the most likely mechanism is a problem with disposal of misfolded or damaged proteins," Dr. Siddique added.

The discovery opens a whole new field for finding an effective treatment for the disease, Dr. Siddique noted in a prepared statement. "We can now test for drugs that would regulate this protein pathway or optimize it, so it functions as it should in a normal state."

The research was published online August 21 in Nature.

Faulty Recycling System

Between 5% and 10% of ALS cases are familial, and previously described mutations in superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), TAR DNA-binding protein (TARDBP, also known as TDP43), and fused in sarcoma (FUS, also known as translocated in liposarcoma (TLS) account for some 30% of classic familial ALS, the researchers note in their report. The causes of the remaining cases of familial ALS and of the vast majority of sporadic ALS are unknown.

Despite extensive studies of previously identified ALS-causing genes, the pathogenic mechanism underlying motor-neuron degeneration in ALS "remains largely obscure," they note. “Dementia, usually of the frontotemporal lobar type, may occur in some ALS cases, but it's unclear whether ALS and dementia share common etiology and pathogenesis in ALS/dementia."

In these functional analyses, the scientists found that a number of mutations in the ubiquilin-2 gene, which is on the X chromosome, can cause an X-linked form of juvenile and adult-onset familial ALS, as well as ALS with dementia.

They found novel ubiquilin-2 pathology in the spinal cords of ALS cases and in the brains of ALS/dementia patients whether or not there was a mutation present.

The ubiquilin-2 protein plays a role in cellular maintenance. It recycles damaged or misfolded proteins in motor and cortical neurons. In people with ALS, it appears that this key function breaks down, leading to the accumulation of damaged proteins in motor neurons in the spinal cord and cortical and hippocampal neurons in the brain.

In a statement, Han-Xiang Deng, MD, first author on the Nature paper and associate professor of neurology at the Feinberg School, notes that faulty protein degradation in ALS "has been suspected, but there was little direct evidence before this study."

New Research Avenue

Although several genes linked to ALS have been identified, until now, the pathogenic mechanisms underlying motor neuron degeneration in ALS have remained largely obscure, preventing development of effective therapeutic approaches.

The scientists say the exact function of ubiquilin-2 is not well understood. However, there is increasing evidence that ubiquilins, together with their interactions with other proteins, may play a role in several neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia, and Parkinson's disease.

"The identification of a new gene linked to familial ALS known to be involved in protein handling of the cell will open up a new avenue of research and bring us closer to understanding this process and what goes wrong in the disease," ALS Association Chief Scientist Lucie Bruijn, PhD, commented in a statement posted on the association's Web page.

"We look forward to follow-on studies that bring us closer to effective therapy for the disease," Dr. Bruijn added.
 
Great news. Here's hoping follow-up research leads to better therapy as the article suggests, or possibly even a cure.
 
A cause, not the cause.
 
Fascinating. In your opinion, how much of a breakthrough do you think this is?
 
I am glad to read that the gene in question is X-linked, since males inherit an X-chromosome only from their mother's side. My uncle who died of ALS when I was less than a year old was my father's younger brother. I personally should be safe, as should my uncle's four sons. I suppose his one daughter may carry the gene though, and there is a lesser chance that my sister might as well. A Y-linked genetic defect would have hit our family much harder though.


Now that I think of it though, it might also be worth noting that the widow of the uncle who died of ALS is now suffering from Parkinson's Disease, which some studies suggest is closely related to ALS. She also happens to be my mother's older sister, so if they both just happened to be genetically unlucky then my cousins and I might have still inherited the defect from the other side of the family.


After reading about these malformed proteins, I got to wondering if Prions might be involved. I'm no expert, but it seems to be that the mix of familial and non-familial cases could be explained by genetic defects creating proteins malformed in such a way as to become contagious. Many patients could be genetically normal individuals suffering from the chain reactions caused by exposure to proteins from those with mutations.
 
A cause, not the cause.

I haven't read this new discovery thoroughly, but I think the above is right, in that the listed diseases are "gain a function" mutations (existing proteins become mutated to cause disease), and the discovered failing is in a protein that I think is yet another ubquitin (proteins which help label other proteins for turnover and degradation through the cell's normal machinery). I'll have to read more though.

I wonder if this news is really evidence that Lou Gehrig's disease might be yet another "gain a function" disease?
 
This is good news. Why is everybody on this website a pessimist?
 
Unfortunately, genetic diseases do not have any cures yet, because gene therapy is still years away. But discovery of genetic origins to a disease does yield the benefit of not having to look for other causes or wasting time with therapies that do not address that problem. For some diseases, this can be a big deal when it is not certain that they are hereditary. Many mental disorders, for example, have controversial origins, with some claiming genetic origins and others infectious origins.
 
Unfortunately, genetic diseases do not have any cures yet, because gene therapy is still years away. But discovery of genetic origins to a disease does yield the benefit of not having to look for other causes or wasting time with therapies that do not address that problem. For some diseases, this can be a big deal when it is not certain that they are hereditary. Many mental disorders, for example, have controversial origins, with some claiming genetic origins and others infectious origins.

I subscribe to the "both sides are right about their postion and wrong about the others' position" school of academia :D
 
Unfortunately, genetic diseases do not have any cures yet, because gene therapy is still years away. But discovery of genetic origins to a disease does yield the benefit of not having to look for other causes or wasting time with therapies that do not address that problem. For some diseases, this can be a big deal when it is not certain that they are hereditary. Many mental disorders, for example, have controversial origins, with some claiming genetic origins and others infectious origins.

It does make sense that to know the cause of the problem, since it rules out lots of things.. There are just so many things i medicine that we are still trying to find out the cause and traditional though some time has been proven incorrect. The last line is important since it goes against generally normal medical practices.
 
The last line is important since it goes against generally normal medical practices.
And speaking of treating infections going against normal practice, interestingly there have been some cases of ALS that, when caught early enough, slowed, stopped, or even reversed. ALS has a very predictable decline for most with it. That doesn't rule out a genetic component also playing a factor.
 
Top Bottom