TheLastOne36
Deity
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2007
- Messages
- 14,045
There is no mystery.
I couldn't agree more, except I think it is now to the point where it is only many instead of most.It says that most of the U.S. electorate have very strong prejudices that they're still struggling to overcome, and that they have quite the cheek to call themselves a democratic or liberal country, bastion of freedom and equality, etc. etc.
How is that really any different from the typical right-wing South American leader? Which country are you from again?None of which disproves in any way the fact that Chávez is a power-hungry megalomaniac whose family and friends have misteriously become millionaires after coming to power.
How is that really any different from the typical right-wing South American leader?
That is exactly my point. How is he any different than any of the the typical far-right banana republic leaders?The fact that Chávez isn't rightist?
You don't come rushing to their defense?That is exactly my point. How is he any different than any of the the typical far-right banana republic leaders?
I'm not "rushing" to anybody's defense, much less Chavez. I'm merely pointing out how hypocritical and disingenuous many of the comments are. Chavez is just an example of a corrupt left-wing politician instead of a right-wing one, and there are far worse who seem to manage to escape any sort of similar criticism largely due to their political and economic ideology.You don't come rushing to their defense?
The kirchner couple started as millionaires.
why did you move there btw? is poland worse?
I'm not a fan of the Cato Institute but what this article says rings true to me.
having the right orchestrate a coup against you and dragging you off to some godforsaken island tends to make you rather paranoid.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2012/09/20/venzuela-crime-chavez-reelection/1581261/Venezuela has become a criminalized state," said Vanessa Neumann, a senior fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute. "You have drug traffickers and Colombian guerrillas operating in the country, and government officials have become involved with them. That makes it difficult to combat crime."
Crime is common in Latin America. The Mexico-based Citizen Council for Public Safety and Criminal Justice, a non-government entity that compiles homicide statistics, found that 40 of the world's 50 most dangerous cities last year were in Latin America.
Venezuela stands apart in two important areas, said Roberto Briceño León, who heads the Observatorio Venezolano de Violencia, a non-government group that monitors crime in the country.
"First, crime here is increasing unlike most Latin countries that are experiencing a decline," he said. "And secondly, the government isn't making it a priority or taking the right steps to combat it."
Instead, Chávez has made it worse by arming groups who support his presidency and taking over state and city police forces, León said.
Murders and kidnappings have soared since Chávez took office in 1999. Last year, the Observatorio estimates 18,850 people were murdered, up from 4,550 in 1998. There were almost 16,000 kidnappings, up from a few hundred in 1998.
Venezuela now has more murders annually than the U.S. and European Union combined
You couldn't pay me enough to move there. No way. Bad as things are in the USA they are much worse in Venezuela by every indication that I've seen/read. There are some other countries that I've considered becoming an expat to live in, but they are not like that.
What exactly are these "government paid gangs" you mention?
Everyone who complains about Venezuela stresses "the violence". What's the history of that?
I mean the people who actually show up to vote. Too many people from the U.S. tell me 'I don't vote' for my peace of mind.I couldn't agree more, except I think it is now to the point where it is only many instead of most.
It's not. But by raising the 'socialist' flag -while having real socialists expelled from the country or from this world altogether- he gets the approval of millions of useful idiots around the globe.Formaldehyde said:How is that really any different from the typical right-wing South American leader?
He is in all but name.The fact that Chávez isn't rightist?
PM.BTW Takhisis, I'll be in Buenos Aires monday. How are things over there?
The kirchner couple started as millionaires.
Ye-es and no. N. Kirchner started making money during what his widow calls a 'successful law practice' which means they were in cahoots with the military government in Santa Cruz during the dirty war and made money by collecting foreclosures on the poor -they have less to give but much less to defend it with. Then, yes, Kirchner did indeed put several hundred million dollars into an offshore bank account (or more) -as a 'safety measure'- which have never been seen again. The Kirchners (the Presidential couple, His sister who's always been a cabinet minister, and also a few nephews, cousins, inlaws, their former driver/bodyguard who's also a millionaire now, etc. etc.) usually buy fiscal land at less than a tenth of its value and sell it for its real value, making astronomical profits.Nestor K became a zillionaire after his rule as governor of Santa Cruz, when one billion dollars simply went missing from the public purse (I am not kidding, that's the actual amount that went missing).
Easy. You give out guns to groups of people so that they can intimidate the opposition. or wavering supporters if need be. In the spare time, they keep their guns and kill each other, or passersby, or both.What exactly are these "government paid gangs" you mention?
It's not. But by raising the 'socialist' flag -while having real socialists expelled from the country or from this world altogether- he gets the approval of millions of useful idiots around the globe.