• 📚 A new project from the admin: Check out PictureBooks.io, an AI storyteller that lets you create personalized picture books for kids in seconds. Give it a try and let me know what you think!

Chile, Argentina Battle British for Slice of Antarctica

Aleenik

Deity
Joined
Jan 14, 2007
Messages
2,203
Location
France
Thursday, March 05, 2009 Associated Press

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,505704,00.html

I thought countries where banned from making new claims on Antartica(though I belive old ones are still allowed)
Apparently they arnt..
Honestly though I think no one should own Antartica and it should just be considerd Earth territory..International Territory that no one owns.




SANTIAGO, Chile — Lawmakers from Chile and Argentina met in Antarctica Thursday, preparing to speak with a common voice against Britain's claim to oil and gas in the southernmost seas.

Chile, Argentina and Britain all claim rights over the same slices of the southernmost continent. This is important for more than the few scientists who live and work in Antarctica, since under a U.N. treaty, coastal countries can control hundreds of miles of continental shelf off their soveriegn territories.

Claims involving Antarctica were tabled for 50 years under a 1959 treaty protecting the icy continent's fragile environment. But the offshore rights have become much more important recently given the global race to secure future energy sources. With the undersea resources in mind, 11 countries have made claims over parts of Antarctica.

The UN's Convention of the Law of the Sea would expand each coastal nation's sovereignty over its continental shelf from 230 miles to 380 miles off shore. But the claims must first be approved by the UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf, which faces a May deadline to announce its decisions.

Other nations asserting claims over the seas around Antarctica include Russia, Brazil, Australia, Ireland, New Zealand, France, Spain and Norway.

But the claims of Argentina, Chile and Britain are particularly difficult to sort out, since the British application to extend the boundaries of the British Antarctic Territory it first claimed in 1908 overlaps with similar claims by Argentina and Chile.

The lawmakers arrived Thursday at Chile's research station, and will meet again Friday at Argentina's base, with plans to issue a joint statement.
 
I thought countries where banned from making new claims on Antartica(though I belive old ones are still allowed)

Banned by whom?
 
These aren't new claims under the Antarctic Treaty, they're old claims that overlap.
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Antarctica,_territorial_claims.svg

600px-Antarctica%2C_territorial_claims.svg.png


The overlapping area between Chile, the UK and Argentina is the red, purple and green area in the top left. More specifically, the purple is actually blue which means Argentina, the darker purple is all three, the Chilean area turns to brown where it overlaps Argentina but not the UK.

Wavy green is Norway, Orange is Australia, little blue slice is France, pink is New Zealand.
 
Falkland Islands 2: The Antarticing!
 
When people made claims I dont see why the first to see Antartica didnt just claim the entire thing and not just one small section

the claims are wild as is though
None should own Antartica
 
No-one really does. Different countries protect and administer it though. The Treaty System has been very effective since the 60s.
 
Pfff, all those claims are silly as hell. You happen to live with in a few HUNDRED miles of a strip of land, you own it HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!111.

This is colonialism all over again, but with out the pesky natives getting in the way.

Hell on this logic, the US can claim owner ship of the MOON! :crazyeye:
 
--------------
 
The part with oil for Brazil, the rest for you.

Who Argentina and Chile think they are, anyway? Brazil could kick their asses combined!
 
Pfff, all those claims are silly as hell. You happen to live with in a few HUNDRED miles of a strip of land, you own it HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!111.

This is colonialism all over again, but with out the pesky natives getting in the way.

Hell on this logic, the US can claim owner ship of the MOON! :crazyeye:

Countires can't own territories in outer space.
 
Of course, this will get a lot more interesting in about seventy years when the Antarctic ice melts and we have a new, fertile continent to populate.
 
If the Antarctic ice actually melts, we'll have a LOT more to worry about than legal jurisdiction over an empty continent. 70 metres of sea level rise?

The peninsula might melt a bit over the next century, but a scenario where the whole thing melts involves absolutely catastrophic climate change.
 
If the Antarctic ice actually melts, we'll have a LOT more to worry about than legal jurisdiction over an empty continent. 70 metres of sea level rise?

The peninsula might melt a bit over the next century, but a scenario where the whole thing melts involves absolutely catastrophic climate change.

Obviously, but you can't just look at the bad stuff that will happen and say, "humanity will roll over and die." There's an afterwards, and that afterwards would include an ice-free Antarctica.
 
Given the ban on resource extraction in Antarctica under the treaty system that regulates how Antarctica gets run, I don't see how it really qualifies as colonialism under any useful definition of the term.

I meant this was like the Treaty of Tordesillas. People with no real claim to the land claiming rights to the land. They EVEN put a stop on any NEW claims. wow.

And lets be honest. The only reason they agreed to that ban was because no one could extract anything of value yet. If there was a crap load of easily pumped oil, i would bet my life the wording would of been crazy different. It's easy to act altruistic when it doesn't cost you anything.
Countires can't own territories in outer space.
See above.
 
Back
Top Bottom