Chirac's chief crony convicted in corruption case

SeleucusNicator

Diadoch
Joined
Aug 25, 2002
Messages
6,822
Location
America
From the New York Times:

French Ex-Premier Is Convicted of Graft
By ELAINE SCIOLINO

PARIS, Jan. 30 — In a serious blow to President Jacques Chirac and the future of his governing party, former Prime Minister Alain Juppé was convicted Friday of corruption in a party scheme to create phony City Hall jobs here during part of Mr. Chirac's mayoralty.

Mr. Juppé, 58, one of Mr. Chirac's closest confidants and his preferred successor if he does not seek a third term, was sentenced to an 18-month suspended prison term and disqualified from public office for 10 years.

The sentence throws Mr. Chirac's center-right party, which Mr. Juppé heads, into turmoil just two months before regional midterm elections and, if upheld, would bar Mr. Juppé from seeking the presidency in 2007.

In an unadorned modern courtroom in the Paris suburb in Nanterre, the man whom Mr. Chirac once called "the most brilliant man of his generation" stood ramrod straight and silent as his name was called and the verdict was announced.

"The tribunal condemns you, sir," Catherine Pierce, the chief judge, began in reading the sentence. Her words were met with a collective gasp from the audience in the packed courtroom. Prosecutors had asked for only an eight-month suspended sentence, nothing more.

The court also rejected Mr. Juppé's request that any guilty verdict not be entered into his criminal record. Mr. Juppé declined to speak to journalists, who were held back by police officers in riot gear and left the court through a back door.

Mr. Juppé said earlier this month that he would end his political career if he was barred from public office. Instead, Mr. Juppé's lawyer, Francis Szpiner, called the verdict "legally questionable and unjust" and pledged that his client would appeal, which would put Mr. Juppe's sentence in abeyance.

That will allow Mr. Juppé to keep, temporarily at least, his triple perches of power as mayor of Bordeaux, a member of Parliament and president of Mr. Chirac's party, the Union for a Popular Movement.

Mr. Chirac had no comment after the verdict. But Prime Minister Jean-Pierre Raffarin told reporters that he was surprised by the verdict and predicted that it would be overturned.

"Today I want to say with force, with conviction and sincerity that the service of France and of the French needs Alain Juppé," Mr. Raffarin said, adding that "a large majority of the French know that Alain Juppé is a statesman, is a man of honor."

In recent years a new generation of tough judges has taken a harder line on prosecuting corruption, but it is still unusual to win convictions against the political elite or to make them stick.

In 2001, for example, former Foreign Minister Roland Dumas was found guilty of accepting favors from the oil company Elf Aquitaine through his mistress, Christine Deviers-Joncours, a former lingerie model and lobbyist for Elf. But the conviction of Mr. Dumas was overturned by a higher court in 2003.

Mr. Juppé, who has proclaimed his innocence throughout the ordeal, was the most high-profile of 27 people set for trial so far in a scandal that unfolded during Mr. Chirac's 18-year tenure as mayor of Paris.

The president has avoided a serious judicial inquiry into how much he knew of the payment scheme by claiming immunity from prosecution, which he enjoys until his term runs out.

But Mr. Chirac's political enemies were swift to attack him.

"All this fake agitation around the fate of Mr. Juppé cannot make us forget that the real responsible party for the fictitious jobs was Jacques Chirac," the leader of the far-right National Front, Jean-Marie Le Pen, said in a statement. He added, "The extremely harsh sentences given condemn first and foremost the present head of state."

Noël Mamère, a member of the Greens who ran against Mr. Chirac in the presidential election in 2002, said on LCI television, "It's not Mr. Juppé who should have been run out of office, but Chirac."

Meanwhile, the current mayor of Paris, Bernard Delanoë, a Socialist who succeeded Mr. Chirac at City Hall, wants the city's money back, although no one has calculated exactly how much was involved. "More than ever, I want the embezzled sums from the city's treasury to be paid back to the city of Paris," Mr. Delanoë said in a statement.

A three-judge panel ruled that Mr. Juppé knew about and helped promote unsavory ties between City Hall and private companies, which put seven members of the party on their payrolls as fictitious employees between 1989 and 1995 to secure public contracts.

At the time, Mr. Juppé was both City Hall's financial director and secretary general of Mr. Chirac's party, then called the Rally for the Republic. Placed under investigation in 1998, Mr. Juppé steadfastly proclaimed his innocence. "I will defend my honor," he pledged in an interview with Le Monde in September just before the trial began.

During the trial, Mr. Juppé's lawyers said he had not known the seven City Hall employees and had not assigned them to work for the party. Mr. Juppé testified that once he learned that the employees held fake jobs, he made sure that they were given real ones. "These were real jobs," he testified. "All the people worked for the city of Paris."

But during the trial the director of his office from 1988 to 1991, Yves Cabana, told the court that "everyone knew" about the illegal payments.

Mr. Juppé's defenders insist that he is a victim of the questionable political financing common on the left and the right before laws were tightened in the late 1980's and 1990's. Indeed, in the interview with Le Monde, he said: "I am responsible, yes. But surely not guilty."

The ultimate loyalist, Mr. Juppé never put the blame on Mr. Chirac, his lifelong political mentor, for the corruption at City Hall.

The son of a farmer from the southwestern Landes region, Mr. Juppé was a brilliant student who attended the prestigious École Nationale d'Administration and rose through the ranks of the French bureaucracy quickly. He carried out a variety of jobs for Mr. Chirac, from serving as a speechwriter in his 20's to becoming foreign minister and then prime minister in the 1990's.

Mr. Juppé's reputation as a cold and intellectually arrogant technocrat made him highly unpopular. He suffered a humiliating defeat when his attempts at changing social policies led to crippling strikes and a stunning loss to the Socialist Lionel Jospin in the 1997 election.

But Mr. Juppé has remained a leading figure of the French center-right, and he crawled back into the top levels of French political life in 2002 when he became head of Mr. Chirac's conservative party after the center-right won back power.

If Mr. Juppé's legal appeal fails, Mr. Chirac's party will have to fill the void. The popular law-and-order interior minister, Nicolas Sarkozy, another would-be presidential candidate, would be a likely successor as party chief.

That would give Mr. Sarkozy a platform from which to challenge Mr. Chirac for the French presidency in elections in 2007. But he may have gone too far in recent months by promoting himself, touting his successes and not hiding his ambitions at the expense of his boss.

First the Saddam bribes, now this. Perhaps it's time to start building a case for regime change to bring before the Security Council? (I mean, they actually have WMDs too!)
 

Kinniken

Riding with William
Joined
Feb 16, 2002
Messages
1,616
Location
Paris, France, EU
Actually, this is excellent news. It proved that in France, no one (beside Chirac) is above the law these days. You can be the favorite of the President and still end up unelectable for ten years after an investigation which touched extremely close to the President's past actions. Can you say the same of your country, SN? Now we only have to wait until 2007 and do the same with Chirac.
And BTW, the offense in question is not even very big corruption: the main part is falsely inscribing seven political advisers as City Hall civil servants, and it happens some 15 years ago or so. And yet it prevents a strong potential Presidential candidate from running in elections for ten years.

As for the "Saddam bribes", unless you are referring to the allegations that Charles Pasqua received oil from Saddam, I do not see what you mean. And if you do, I have to say that I find them extremely strange considering that this supposed saddam-backer supported the first Gulf War... (which does not stop him from being a nationalist bully, something of a French Rumsfeld)
 

Marla_Singer

United in diversity
Joined
Oct 24, 2001
Messages
13,170
Location
Paris, west side (92).
I agree with Kinniken. I just want to add Juppé had been convicted for something that is plainly legal in the USA : financing a political party with private funds.*

*In France, political parties are publically funded according to their results in latest elections. A small private support is still allowed but large fundings are forbidden because it would lead our politicians to act according to private interests they would have to keep as political sponsors.
 

stormbind

Retenta personam!
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
14,081
Location
London
Time to invade France and depose that corrupt regime! Yeehaw...
 

h4ppy

You sir, pineapple?
Joined
Jul 11, 2003
Messages
5,989
Location
H4ppy Valley
Originally posted by stormbind
Time to invade France and depose that corrupt regime! Yeehaw...
I agree.:)
 

Akka

Moody old mage.
Joined
Nov 14, 2001
Messages
14,845
Location
Facing my computer.
Hey, it means my mayor will be cast out of the city direction, then ? ^^

Well, I'm a strong left-wing guy, and I have no love for him, but honestly, I agree with several opinions : it's Chirac who was the main responsible, and Juppé is more of a scapegoat.

See you in jail in three year, Mr President :p

(Chirac, I mean, not our famed english poster ^^)
 

The Yankee

The New Yawker
Retired Moderator
Joined
Sep 1, 2002
Messages
19,467
Location
Minneapolis, MN
"First the Saddam bribes, now this. Perhaps it's time to start building a case for regime change to bring before the Security Council? (I mean, they actually have WMDs too!)"

I wonder if that will get vetoed....:mischief: Oh well, maybe they'll forget to show up!

There's been a small string of corruption cases around the world recently. Either they're getting too lazy or the prosecutors are getting good...Nah, just lazy. ;)

It's good news when anyone is found out for corruption and successfully removed. I wonder how deep this one goes.
 

Marla_Singer

United in diversity
Joined
Oct 24, 2001
Messages
13,170
Location
Paris, west side (92).
As long as all lobbies will continue to fund both american parties, I think you aren't really well placed to talk about such a story.

Come on ! A party had been financed with private funds... that's legal in many countries including the US. I'm not excusing the guy and I'm glad he had been convicted for that. I just think it's lame for americans to judge France as "corrupt" because of that.
 

cgannon64

BOB DYLAN'S ROCKIN OUT!
Joined
Jun 19, 2002
Messages
19,213
Location
Hipster-Authorland, Brooklyn (Hell)
Gasp! Chirac invented a few jobs for friends!

Wow, we should really be looking out corrupt amongst world leaders, becasue we know we sure are free from it here!
 

Kinniken

Riding with William
Joined
Feb 16, 2002
Messages
1,616
Location
Paris, France, EU
Actually Pontiuth Pilate, these days they are brought to justice more and more often :D Fabius, Strauss Khan, Pasqua, now Juppé... All political heavyweights (from both the left and right) who faced major trials (though Strauss Khan was found innocent). The only really big fish still missing is Chirac, and that should be fixed in 2007 :evil:

So, that enquiry into the links between Enron and the Bush administration or the allocation of contracts to Halliburton, when is it starting? :p
 

Kinniken

Riding with William
Joined
Feb 16, 2002
Messages
1,616
Location
Paris, France, EU
Originally posted by cgannon64
Gasp! Chirac invented a few jobs for friends!

Worst still, he used private money to finance his party, thus giving him an edge in the "media war"! :eek: No wonder people are shocked!
 

yaroslav

Emperor
Joined
Jan 4, 2002
Messages
1,223
Location
Madrid, Spain
I've never understood why the President in France is out of law' reach. I mean, it seems that Chirac was a pretty corupt guy when he was the major of Paris.

Still, the Jugdes in France appears to discover many corruption schemes... It appears to me that Justice in France works quite nice, although I can be wrong.
 

Akka

Moody old mage.
Joined
Nov 14, 2001
Messages
14,845
Location
Facing my computer.
The president in office can be only condemned for treason for as long as he's president, IIRC.

It's probably to avoid political frames to incapacitate a rival president, I suppose.

But it's not being "above the law". It's the law being "in wait". As soon as he leave the office, he's being subjected to whatever affair he had during and before the presidency.
 

luiz

Trendy Revolutionary
Joined
Nov 19, 2001
Messages
20,544
I live in Corruption Land, in brazilian standards Chirac is pretty honest guy.

I would change him for my president anytime of the day!
 

Kinniken

Riding with William
Joined
Feb 16, 2002
Messages
1,616
Location
Paris, France, EU
Originally posted by luiz
I live in Corruption Land, in brazilian standards Chirac is pretty honest guy.

I would change him for my president anytime of the day!

Actually, I think I would accept that exchange. Lula may have his faults, but I far prefer him to Chirac... And speaking of corruption, has he ever been accused of anything? I had the impression he was quite clean...
 

luiz

Trendy Revolutionary
Joined
Nov 19, 2001
Messages
20,544
Originally posted by Kinniken


Actually, I think I would accept that exchange. Lula may have his faults, but I far prefer him to Chirac... And speaking of corruption, has he ever been accused of anything? I had the impression he was quite clean...

Send Chirac! :D

Now, sorry for the threadjack and the rant, but Lula really pisses me off! :D

-He created almost 10 new ministerys(all paid with public money). Among those new ministerys, there are aberrations like: Ministery of Social Development, Ministery of Hunger Combat(and I thougt that part of social development is to end hunger ;) ), Ministery of Racial Equality(I hate this one particularly. Isn't the damn Constitution enough to punish racism?!) and Ministery of Women's Rights. :o

-The former president retired the old 707 airplane of the Presidency, and to save money he decided to travell on "charter" flights of a local airline. But Lula thinks we are very rich and should have an extremely modern and expensive plane. So, with taxpayer's money, he bought a brand new airbus for U$80 millions. It also has an extremely expensive maintanance.

-Lula created 110,000 new work posts at the government. ALL of those new posts were filled with people from his party, and they were hired without any concursation, what is illegal and above all, immoral. Why he did this? Because 20% of all the income of his party's members go the Party(Worker's Party)

-Lula criticised the former president ALOT for the big ammount of time he spent travelling. Well, in 1 year Lula travelled more then the former president in his entire first term. I don't remember a single entire week that Lula spent in Brasília. Why does he travell so much? Because each day he stays away from Brasília he receives U$3,000. He's becoming extremely rich at the nation's expenses.

-Lula is friends with Fidel Castro, Muamar Gadaffi, Hugo Chávez and al-Assad. Enough said.

-The former president created independent agencys to fiscalise the government. Since those agencys were in the way of Lula's quest for absolute power, he simply took all power away from them and gave it to the Minister, who he names.

-On two different occasions, Lula said that Napoleon visited China. :o

Are you still willing to trade?
 

yaroslav

Emperor
Joined
Jan 4, 2002
Messages
1,223
Location
Madrid, Spain
Originally posted by Akka
The president in office can be only condemned for treason for as long as he's president, IIRC.

It's probably to avoid political frames to incapacitate a rival president, I suppose.

But it's not being "above the law". It's the law being "in wait". As soon as he leave the office, he's being subjected to whatever affair he had during and before the presidency.

Yes, you're right. I know that about "in wait", because the newspaper I read (El Pais) is a partner of Le Monde and includes a lot of news about France ;) But I don't see a good reason to put the president in such a special state.

In Spain, there's a compromise, because in order to sue the president you need both the Supreme Tribunal and the Congress to allow it, but it's possible to do so :)
 
Top Bottom