Thanks! Re: Majapahit, I respectfully disagree. My reasoning for going with Indonesia is as follows: 1. Not many non-history initiates have heard of Majapahit. By contrast, Indonesia is very recognizable. 2. There are plenty of other Indonesian empires that also deserve representation: Sailendra, Srivijaya, etc. "Indonesia" includes them where "Majapahit" is much more exculsive. 3. A Majapahit city list would be difficult to implement, esp. since their capital city has proved so elusive to identify. By contrast, Indonesia could simply start with Jakarta. 4. Going with more recognizable modern names is the general trend with Civ games. For example, we have "Korea" not "Choson," "India" not "Mughals," and "the Aztecs" not "Tenochca." Anyway, that's my reasoning. Good call on some of those wonders there. +1 to the Alhambra, Temple of Heaven, Leaning Tower of Pisa, Karnak, and a few of the others.