Civ seems not to have settled initial city on the 2-18 beta

JamesNinelives

Emperor
Joined
Mar 16, 2019
Messages
1,676
Location
Australia
I encountered something rather strange where a civ has no cities but does have it's starting units. 0 tech, 0 policies, 0 cities. Gives the impression they never founded their initial city.

I mention this because I remember someone else noting something similar in the 2-18 comments but not sure who. And I wonder if it might have any relevance to the current issues with CTDs on that beta. Unfortunately that was some games ago so I don't have any logs or a save for it, just this screenshot. Was wondering if other people had noticed it to see if we could get a correlation or noncorrelation.

Also just wondering how often this is occuring, i.e. if other people have experienced it.

Spoiler Homeless :( :
20200223213516_1.jpg
 
Last edited:
There should be a small link in your original post, in the upper left, that lets you edit the title.

I can see two links that say edit. One allows me to edit the tags, and the other allows me to edit the text of the post. Can't seem to change the title through either though.

Spoiler Screenshot :
Capture.PNG

Edit: Oh, I found it! It was under 'Thread Tools' on the top right. Thanks anyway.
 
Last edited:
Hi - I was the one who mentioned this. It happened with France two different times to me; he's still in the game even though he's not in the game.

What's funny later on is that he actually gets votes in the world council...haha.
 
Hi - I was the one who mentioned this. It happened with France two different times to me; he's still in the game even though he's not in the game.

What's funny later on is that he actually gets votes in the world council...haha.

The Iroquois pathfinder actually made it all the way to me on the other side of the continent (and then back again?). That's when I noticed his score was a bit strange and went looking for the reason XD.
 
Back
Top Bottom