cavilier210
Warlord
Wow, i woulda just closed the thread due to its pointlessness, lol
Just because you can expect tacky, ethnocentric behavior doesn't mean it's justified.
I took a moment to refresh myself on Civ IV leader traits and they were very general and the same ones applied to multiple leaders across the spectrum. It was better at trying to be more objective than the leader traits in Civ V.
Why the hell bring Poland into this discussion? Have you guys any problems with it?
A diplomatic victory announcement frames it as a competitive event, stating “you have triumphed over your foes” and your cunning has “divided and sown confusion among your enemies.” In Civilization V, enough riches can buy peace, and peace is just another form of selfish control. .
You have triumphed over your foes through the art of Diplomacy! Your cunning and wisdom have earned you great friends - and divided and sown confusion among your enemies! Forever you will be remembered as the leader who brought peace to a weary world!
So is the original poster saying that the Civilization game itself (DVD, box, etc) is racist against Indians? I would think the OP means the publishers or developers. Because that would mean that 2K Greg and 2K Elizabeth are also in on the whole thing, along with Sid. Are these the people that are racist, or only specific people? Will you please name who you are talking about OP. Thanks ahead of time for clarifying for me.
lolno, didn't you read to the end of my post? People generally don't insinuate that authors they like write under the influence of drugs.
Finally, someone who finds hex tiles as racially and historically offensive as I do!!!
I wonder what shapes wouldn't offend the author? Circles? Maybe if we were all on the same tile holding hands...
Ok, we've seen the arts students rant. Now I want to see a rant blog from the physics student who complains about CiV going for "3D graphics" when really they should have been aiming for an 8th dimensional gameplay projected onto a 6D plane, or something like that.
You still need to project onto a 2d plane to see it, so any game that's more than 3d is going to be difficult to play because you need to rotate all the freakin time to get a useful projection (I tried 4D games, they're not very fun).
In fact, I was thoroughly pleased by the pretty 2d hexagonal crystal presented in my ICS empire and tempted to show it to my fifth-semester students as a "real-world example" of lattice growth.
Besides, everyone knows most of the dimensions are only visible at high energy and rolled up otherwise like the newspaper your dog brings you in each morning - if he's a good dog - even though stringterrortheorists can't prove a thing (but still get a ton of research funding - way to go!)
Yeah, I'm going to go out and spend thousands of dollars to understand a post, to your "intellectual" standard, yet is ultimately pointless. I guess now you're going to start throwing around phrases like "Intellectual Checkmate".
Condescending, much?
"I'm ignorant and proud of it" is never a statement one should make.
The guy has a point on the one hand that Civilization enforces notions of the world which A) aren't remotely accurate (the enforcement of the State as the central unit of decision-making and the idea that the citizens of the State have no power or desires as long as the State throws them an occasional bone is, well, disturbing, to say the least. It's the central conceit of the book 1984, among others) and B) represent the ideals espoused by various euro- and america-centric groups over the years, who seek to reduce the narrative of humanity to one of progress to a pinnacle of civilization, which is of course the idealized version of whatever civilization the group in question happens to belong to.
On the flip side, that blog's critique fails to address a critical point: does it matter if Civilization is intellectually bankrupt? The answer is a resounding no. Unless the model was developed far beyond the possibilities within a game produced on a reasonable budget (even a AAA budget), it's not going to provide real insight into historicity or any real academic value (and it never was intended to do so). Unless the blogger is advocating sterilizing all media that presents stereotypes that they're uncomfortable with, Civilization is no worse than myriad other things, and to over-intellectualize it is to miss the point utterly.
I'm posting to let you know: Yes, I am responding to you. I also want you to know that, because of how your post was started, I'm not even going to read past the first sentence.
I'm comfortable with that.
You still need to project onto a 2d plane to see it, so any game that's more than 3d is going to be difficult to play because you need to rotate all the freakin time to get a useful projection (I tried 4D games, they're not very fun).
In fact, I was thoroughly pleased by the pretty 2d hexagonal crystal presented in my ICS empire and tempted to show it to my fifth-semester students as a "real-world example" of lattice growth.
Besides, everyone knows most of the dimensions are only visible at high energy and rolled up otherwise like the newspaper your dog brings you in each morning - if he's a good dog - even though stringterrortheorists can't prove a thing (but still get a ton of research funding - way to go!)
I don't play 4D games, because I think they're a scam. The majority of human brains can understand what 4D is, but cannot process or visualize it beyond a hypothetical. To then project that 4D down 1 dimension, it becomes 3D; then to put it on a surface, it becomes 2D. So, a 4D game is really a 2 dimensional representation of a 3 dimensional "shadow" of a 4D object.
It's the equivalent of holding up a cube to the light, then tracing the shadow it casts... then trying to draw that shadow on a 1 dimensional surface. It would just be a straight line; a poor representation of the original object.
Our human senses allow us to perceive 4D easily. We live through a sequence of events, which are determined by a where and a when.
Wait, what?
A 4 dimensional game doesn't use 4 spacial demensions. Its dimensions of gameplay. Expand, Explore, and yadda yadda.