Obama administration's legal problems? Did I miss some indictments?
Obama administration's legal problems? Did I miss some indictments?
Don't you remember their fielding a candidate who wasn't born on the soil of the U.S. of A.?Obama administration's legal problems? Did I miss some indictments?
Not yet. The just appointed a US Attorney to look into the irregularities. Still, the stink of fear is getting strong. Comey and Brennan are trading barbs and tossing accusations. Both are central to the scandal.Obama administration's legal problems? Did I miss some indictments?
Paul Ryan was better than Nancy Pelosi. It's a low standard so Ryan could clear it.I'd be surprised to hear that any Republicans since 2008 are better than even the worst Democrats over the same time period. But go ahead, hit me with an example, please.
Still, the stink of fear is getting strong.
J
I think that might just be Trump's diapers.
There is an article on the 35 most useless members with Iowa Republican Steve King the very worst. It's a fair assortment of dreck from both parties, with one independent mixed in.
http://scribol.com/news-and-politics/politics/least-effective-members-congress/
Not yet. The just appointed a US Attorney to look into the irregularities. Still, the stink of fear is getting strong. Comey and Brennan are trading barbs and tossing accusations. Both are central to the scandal.
Paul Ryan was better than Nancy Pelosi. It's a low standard so Ryan could clear it.
With 535 members of congress, you should be astonished if some of the Republicans were not better than some of the Democrats and vice versa. There is an article on the 35 most useless members with Iowa Republican Steve King the very worst. It's a fair assortment of dreck from both parties, with one independent mixed in.
http://scribol.com/news-and-politics/politics/least-effective-members-congress/
J
Attack an ally of Putin's? I don't think even AIPAC has that power."Hope not."
-- Trump, asked if we are going to war with Iran
Weren't you recently arguing that Putin was happy for Trump to attack his allies in Venezuela because it would cause exploitable chaos? What makes this different?Attack an ally of Putin's? I don't think even AIPAC has that power.
Oh yes, but that's the last possible option. If you look at what Trump's actually been doing rather than saying (same as his supposed trade war with the evil Mexicans who will pay for the wall by not paying taxes on steel imports to the US) So far Trump's been acting in favour of Maduro while (by) pretending to be the usual warmonger. His officials prematurely fingered the waverers in Maduro's military which gave him time to neutralise them, his government is refusing to help the Venezuelan government they recognise as legitimate from saving Citgo for being turned over to the Russian creditors of the government they call illegitimate for a pittance, and once Maduro's opponents started saying that foreign military intervention was acceptable after all there still was no action.Weren't you recently arguing that Putin was happy for Trump to attack his allies in Venezuela because it would cause exploitable chaos? What makes this different?
I call BS. There are no worse examples of humanity than Bill and Hillary Clinton. Even the Donald is a fine specimen in comparison. The Democrats were the ones covering up for everything the Clintons did.If we're talking about effectiveness then Pelosi is miles ahead of Paul Ryan. I'm talking about something else... more how bad they are as people than how bad they are as legislators. There is certainly overlap, but it has very little to do with efficiency.
I call BS. There are no worse examples of humanity than Bill and Hillary Clinton.J
Attack an ally of Putin's? I don't think even AIPAC has that power.
Weren't you recently arguing that Putin was happy for Trump to attack his allies in Venezuela because it would cause exploitable chaos? What makes this different?
Bingeley bingeley beep!Oh yes, but that's the last possible option. If you look at what Trump's actually been doing rather than saying (same as his supposed trade war with the evil Mexicans who will pay for the wall by not paying taxes on steel imports to the US) So far Trump's been acting in favour of Maduro while (by) pretending to be the usual warmonger. His officials prematurely fingered the waverers in Maduro's military which gave him time to neutralise them, his government is refusing to help the Venezuelan government they recognise as legitimate from saving Citgo for being turned over to the Russian creditors of the government they call illegitimate for a pittance, and once Maduro's opponents started saying that foreign military intervention was acceptable after all there still was no action.
So that, right there, is exploiting chaos. The investigations on the Cuban government hiring out slave-doctors are also at a standstill, and so on.
Going by that example, you'll have the same on Iran. The US could have picked on the Iranian operatives and warships sent to Venezuela but didn't, and hasn't Trump been refusing to apply sanctions imposed by Congress already?
--Democrat governor writing Trumps speech... ''And then the doctor and the mother determine whether ...''"The baby is born. The mother meets with the doctor. They take care of the baby. They wrap the baby beautifully. And then the doctor and the mother determine whether or not they will execute the baby."
-- Trump