Colonies: Yay or Nay!

Discussion in 'Civ4 - General Discussions' started by Army of Scouts, Jul 18, 2011.

  1. Sir Penguinboy

    Sir Penguinboy Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2011
    Messages:
    15
    Location:
    New York (THE STATE, NOT THE CITY)
    I think its colonies in general
     
  2. Ataxerxes

    Ataxerxes Deity

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2009
    Messages:
    3,073
    Hope I haven't added to the confusion. I believe we're talking about releasing those cities as a vassal civ. I think you were following the discussion. I think some players are confusing this with vassals in general without realizing there is a difference.

    For instance, I generally like taking vassals. It speeds up domination and diplomation victories and can provide help with research and war. I dislike releasing cities on distant continents as colonies even though they become vassals. That slows down those victories.

    Colonies can lower maintenance costs but, for me, that doesn't make up for what you lose usually. Especially under State Property.
     
  3. Antilogic

    Antilogic --

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Messages:
    15,602
    I started losing it when colonies were the source of costs, not the solution to reducing maintenance costs. I don't see the trade route point as particularly strong because you can always trade with AIs on other continents to pad your income.

    This obviously takes a backseat to my preferred method: :hammer:
     
  4. Army of Scouts

    Army of Scouts Noble Cheater

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Messages:
    89
    Location:
    Free World
    Colonies could of been great, but like so many things they're unbalanced and it's not clear which is better at a given time. Just like firaxis :sad:
     

Share This Page