I'm assuming that technically speaking, there aren't any incompatibilities with mods that add new civilizations (I assume this because the "Mods compatible with VP" doesn't seem to have a blanket ban on mods that add new civs. But mechanically speaking, how do modded civs compare to the modded "vanilla" choices? Are they vastly over or under-powered in comparison? If it depends from mod to mod, the one that I like to include is Rhodesia. I also play with JFD's Switzerland, but according to the sticky it seems like JFD's civs tend to work just fine.
Compatability with modded Civs?
- Thread starter asorel
- Start date
Moi Magnus
Emperor
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2015
- Messages
- 1,867
In short:
+ In VP, Unique Abilities of civs are really good. The worst UA of VP are at the level of the best UA of vanilla. A modded div will most likely have a "bad" UA.
+ Any happiness effect will be far stronger in VP than in vanilla. It means that if the modded civ has a happiness unique building, it will most likely be OP.
+ In VP, Unique Abilities of civs are really good. The worst UA of VP are at the level of the best UA of vanilla. A modded div will most likely have a "bad" UA.
+ Any happiness effect will be far stronger in VP than in vanilla. It means that if the modded civ has a happiness unique building, it will most likely be OP.
vyyt
Deity
And good people are making VP versions of moddedcivs here:
https://forums.civfanatics.com/threads/vox-populi-compatible-civilizations-showcase.574461/
https://forums.civfanatics.com/threads/vox-populi-compatible-civilizations-showcase.574461/
