I agree.The "Time Cube" is just crazy talk.
Ruling out the number 4 as power; the number 5 is more significant where power is concerned.
uhhh?
The author says 4 is a power number but I know that power is more a set in and of itself. 1, 2, 3 and 4 make a set. Thus, 5 alone is a set. The number 5, as with speed-o-meters in cars; you wouldn't divide that as 4. Speed from 10mph to 200mph doesn't fit into a 4 set.
0mph
10mph 1 - 5
Med speed 3 - 5
Top speed 5 - 5
Try the same with 4.
10 mph 1 - 4
Med speed 2 or 3 - 4
Top speed 4 - 4
The first pattern wins.
Basically I know how power works, per se, speed o meters; plug sockets and energy propulsion, etc. And it's always a product that can be divided by 5. Take wall, plug, wire, deposit, on. Take captured energy in triangle wall socket with pronged plug.
Singularity on wall entrar prongs on a two scale.
More?
Lift arm above head and, rub.
Push arm out in front, and, clench.
Rub; push hand back and forth.
Clench; close hand into a fist.
These are all sets of 5 as you can count. The way a sentence is written, is 5, but the way it is produced is a 6, barely, and I have a lot to say about this number.
Which author? Where? I'm quite lost. How is any of this connected to consciousness?The author says ....
I'm not the one who brought it up.Which author? Where? I'm quite lost. How is any of this connected to consciousness?
I'm not the one who brought it up.
There's evidence to suggest that Angst brought up TimeCube.As an observer, so far I think you bought it up.
The conversation can be fruitful and interesting if it directed to become a trade of ideas, and lay down any possible wall that would block or disturb the honest exchange.
I think there will be more peoples/poster who genuinely interest will join the thread, if the current active participant able to keep it up.
There's evidence to suggest that Angst brought up TimeCube.
Look, you all seem to be going haywire, fighting inaccurate wars.
Whether you can help it or not, it's not my problem.
I shared an idea, I answered to each person; not much more I can do.
If you're going to act like artistic masterpieces, who should be viewed proportionately, at least have some difference between you. Haywire - Inaccurate war - it bores me to be honest.
How rude is it that birdjaguar doesn't take Angst into account when regarding the TimeCube topic? Pins it on me.
Right, I am done.
Your forum is a pervert-hive, sorry people who are not so perverse.
See-ya.
Consciousness, seems to inaccurately represent what is, for no use of a better term(I jest, 'spirit'), something more. Consciousness is the quiddity(~whatness) of the subject. However, I argue that consciousness is a process of, this something, and it has been factorised falsely - where no concise term had been applied.
To be conscious is to be alert of universe physics, though it is often considered to be awareness.
If we regain consciousness after an unconscious spell we do not instantly become aware of the environment(it's often blurry and clouded in mind.)
To be aware of universe physics is is a jump forward, a set function is necessary; for example; to focus, to look, to sniff, etc.
I cannot be aware passively but can be subliminally aware(a fraction of total awareness) of local physics, such as seeing out of the corner of my eye.
Alertness is a reception; it occurs passively, and it ties in pretty well with consciousness.
Therefore, consciousness is not what is inner drive(-driver), but that's something more. The phenomenon of consciousness is something related to this something but in theory it is a element of the accurate association. I conclude by asking for constructive debate or discussions on this matter(possibly including the word 'spirit' in a non-theological sense).
In Soviэт Яцssiд, ground walks on you!A bit like claiming that the ground is what walks you.
Story of my life, dude(tte)!Look, you all seem to be going haywire, fighting inaccurate wars.
No, no it's not.
Ruling out the number 4 as power; the number 5 is more significant where power is concerned.
Right. I'm sorry but I felt Angst was molesting me.
I only mentioned the author of TimeCube after reading it for the first time after Angst mentioned it.
I cannot control my response, I dislike bullies.
Right. I'm sorry but I felt Angst was molesting me.
I only mentioned the author of TimeCube after reading it for the first time after Angst mentioned it.