The problem is, in practical terms of allowable activities, there's hardly any difference between zero cases and a non-zero number of cases that's within the capacity that contact tracing is able to deal with.
There is. Singapore thought they were on top of things. They weren't.
Your first sentence doesn't follow from the latter two.
I don't expect that it's realistic for any country with zero cases to have borders tight enough to ensure zero cases indefinitely. There's no practical difference to R between one case and a hundred.
Singapore had a very small amount of cases. They thought they were on top of it with contact tracing and apps.
a government website was taken down and then put back up but with cumulative death tolls removed, daily bulletins are now published three hours later, i.e. after the television news programmes instead of before, they still don't have a health minister, and they are having at least a death a minute. But Bolsonaro says it's everyone's fate to die so he's not worried.
Looks like we officially wiped it out.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/418514/no-active-cases-and-no-new-cases-of-covid-19-in-nz
Restrictions lifted from midnight.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/politica...-ardern-reveals-move-to-level-1-from-midnight
Only took 100 days and we knocked the bastard off!!
From PM of NZ herself: “[..] elimination is not a point in time, it is a sustained effort [...] We almost certainly will see cases here again, and I do want to say that again, we will almost certainly see cases here again [...]”
Yyyyes, except that you're missing the part where the new health minister is an army general with no expertise on the subject who's been put there by Bolsonaro just to keep things in hand.It might just be that the they have concluded that the cumulative death toll is so
inaccurate as to be dangerously misleading and not worth arguing for it to be listing.
A lot of people think that excess deaths over what would be
expected from the same period in previous years; either
uncorrected for changes in population age profiles or
actuarily corrected for such changes; is more meaningful.
It might just be that the they have concluded that the cumulative death toll is so
inaccurate as to be dangerously misleading and not worth arguing for it to be listing.
A lot of people think that excess deaths over what would be
expected from the same period in previous years; either
uncorrected for changes in population age profiles or
actuarily corrected for such changes; is more meaningful.
Wouldn't surprise me. We don't know if it's recurring and asymptomatic carriers may have been missed.
Still they found no community cases in a month of looking.
So are all restrictions lifted now? I bet being a normal unrestricted economy could draw a lot of investment. NZ should have pretty low risk for 2nd waves. Other countries are less able to control their borders. Also few countries have the same level of trust when it comes to being open about new cases.
Hear that distant thunder? That's all the worlds pension funds coming your way.
Belarus ran football games.I am working Security for the super rugby next weekend, it might be one of the first professional sports events with a crowd in the world. Since this all started.