Corruption & Waste: Problematic vs. Minimal

[AbuHab]

I recently ran a test and found that Fascism ("minimal" corruption) causes exactly the same level of corruption and waste as Monarchy and Feudalism (both with "problematic" corruption levels), after adjusting for the loss of population resulting from a switch to Fascism.

Am I right? Is there no practical difference between "problematic" and "minimal" corruption levels?

Note: I have Civ III Conquests with the final patch.

 

[vmxa]

I have not tried it, but ihave heard others say the same thing.

 

[TimBentley]

Actually, fascism has nuisance corruption (same as republic). There is a slight reduction in rank corruption compared to problematic; roughly, it increases the OCN by 10%.

Here would be a useful link.

 

[AbuHab]

Actually, fascism has nuisance corruption (same as republic). There is a slight reduction in rank corruption compared to problematic; roughly, it increases the OCN by 10%.

Here would be a useful link.

Yeah, sorry, I meant "Nuisance," not "Minimal." In a normal-sized world with 50 cities (averaging size 8), there wasn't a single bit of difference between Nuisance and Problematic--not one commerce, not one shield. If there is a difference, it's awfully subtle.