I didn't specify 'coup' myself, I asked the mods to split it off from the many-questions thread and it's the title they picked for me.
He said republicans were talking about it. Just like liberals are doing here. This took me about 15 sec to find:President Obama Confirms He Will Refuse to Leave Office If Trump Is Elected
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/obama-confirms-he-will-refuse-to-leave-office/
Yeah, that's true. Republicans did project some pretty insane stuff on him.The crucial difference being that it wasn't Obama who claimed that he might refuse to leave. Trump, on the other hand, being entirely oblivious to everything wrong with him, openly has stated he might refuse to accept the result and ask for checks etc etc.
Yeah, that's true. Republicans did project some pretty insane stuff on him.
The difference doesn't really matter though. There's no way Trump could white knuckle control beyond his normal term. He just doesn't have enough support from the agencies and military that he'd need to pull it off. Have people really missed all the whining about the deep state being against him? The intelligence agencies dislike him and the military leaders dont respect him.
I've seen the fact that the NDSP was a minority party that never had full popular support brought up. What it did have was majority military support. After the Night of the Long Knives soldiers had to take an oath of loyalty to the NDSP. This parallel can go back to every strongman who wrested control from the previous government. Ceasar, Hitler, Napoleon, etc. they did it because they held sway over the actual power.
Private Bonespurs doesn't have that, especially when his opponent is as nonthreatening to the institution as Biden is and had a son of his own in the service. I don't think nor do I want the military to intervene but that's the point. In order for him to pull it off they'd need to. If people think the BLM riots are bad wait til Trump tries to illegally keep power.
Or reaffirming faith that no one person can override the checks and balances. That the system is resilient enough to withstand that onslaught.The difference absolutely does matter, though. Because even in the doomed-to-be-unsuccessful attempt, he'd be further eroding trust in American democracy.
Or reaffirming faith that no one person can override the checks and balances. That the system is resilient enough to withstand that onslaught.
I'm not worried though. He's not going to do it. He's just doing what he did in 2016. Creating a narrative where when he loses he has an out. A claim that he's a winner and the only way someone can beat him is by cheating. Considering how long conservatives have been claiming election shenanigans it won't change where we are right now.
The GoP has been doing that for decades. It's nothing new. I don't like it. I want them to stop but this isn't some new existential threat that hasn't existed for most of my life.Your faith is not the issue though, nor is mine. It is the faith of those who believe Trump in the first place. Those minds are being poisoned, and in 2016 the result was "we have huge amounts of voter fraud, but yay the system works" and in 2020 for them it will be "our system doesn't work" and the closer the results are (assuming a Trump loss) the more convinced of this that they will be. Remember 2008 and Dems thinking that if it is essentially a tie, that the system doesn't work. Trump fans are going to feel that way even when the result isn't down to a few thousand votes in a state on which the EC balance rests one way or the other.
The crucial difference being that it wasn't Obama who claimed that he might refuse to leave. Trump, on the other hand, being entirely oblivious to everything wrong with him, openly has stated he might refuse to accept the result and ask for checks etc etc.
The difference absolutely does matter, though. Because even in the doomed-to-be-unsuccessful attempt, he'd be further eroding trust in American democracy.
Candidates are allowed those checks
You think American democracy is worthy of trust? I think Trump is exposing why the trust has eroded. Why are we still in all these wars? Because democracy is run by the people who profit from war, Wall St, the Pentagon, the local factory building weapons.
States and local municipalities run the elections not the federal government. Trump's mostly impotent when it comes to rigging.Trump is the president - usually the party in power is able to rig elections, not some shadowy deep state.
Besides, the military-industrial complex does fine under Trump, didn't Trump brag about how he uses the US army as a mercenary force for Saudi Arabia?
Trump is the president - usually the party in power is able to rig elections, not some shadowy deep state.
Besides, the military-industrial complex does fine under Trump, didn't Trump brag about how he uses the US army as a mercenary force for Saudi Arabia?