Crhristianity? Should it develope a sense of humour about itself?

[Sidhe]

The thing about those cartoons is that three of them were NOT created in Denmark by the journalists. Those three were the truly offensive ones.

Where are the creators of those? Why did the muslim clerics take them to Egypt to show the Organization of Islamic States group? Why did they tell the world that the Danish journalists created them when they didn't?

Why weren't they punished by the Sharia courts? Why wasn't a fatwa issued? Why did they get away with it? Why was there no investigation? Why is the infor covered up?

I wasn't aware of that, pardon my rant

What I thought was silly was that even after the religion had said it is idolatry to show the image of Mohammed and basically it had blown up they refused to retract them, imagine if they'd of shown an image of Christ in an act of sodemy, and then refused to destroy it? It's the same thing? People just don't understand the depth of faith in Islam, and just how offensive idolotry is to them.

The spelling error in the title of thread still hasn't being corrected!!!

It's my trademark (R)(C).

 

[Smidlee]

It's my trademark (R)(C).

Also they must not been aware of the threads which show as long the first and last letters are correct the brain can figure out the word.

 

[Sidhe]

Also they must not been aware of the threads which show as long the first and last letters are correct the brain can figure out the word.

Actually it's just because I can't spell, but I like your idea better

 

[Zarn]

Sure, Zarn...!

I don't know what passes for making fun in your book...
But I cannot recall any major religious victories on CFC...Ever!

Then again, you religionists specialise in revising history to suit your ends!

I do not recall any victories at all, either way. I never respond to those threads, anyway.

I was talking about 'real life.' It is a concept some CFCers do not know about.

 

[VX250]

The fact the title still hasn't being corrected shows how shamelesly anti-christian the atttiude is here.

 

[Atlas14]

The fact the title still hasn't being corrected shows how shamelesly anti-christian the atttiude is here.

Somehow I get more of a paranoia vibe from the Christians...

 

[Sidhe]

The fact the title still hasn't being corrected shows how shamelesly anti-christian the atttiude is here.

I asked the mods to delete all my screw up threads about 4 hours ago, one is still going, I wouldn't expect lightning service at the weekend, I can assure you some of the mods are Christians themselves.

 

[Erik Mesoy]

The fact the title still hasn't being corrected shows how shamelesly anti-christian the atttiude is here.

Don't be ridiculous. Far more likely that the OP is lazy.

(Edit: I won't even begin to comment on the repeated cases of "athiest" and "religon" which appear regularly.)

 

[Sidhe]

Don't be ridiculous. Far more likely that the OP is lazy.

(Edit: I won't even begin to comment on the repeated cases of "athiest" and "religon" which appear regularly.)

Actually it's far more likely that the OP just can't be bothered because it's pedantry, you want it changed you moan. If I'd of done it deliberately fine, but I mean lighten up.

christrionics perhaps. It's spelt wrong ohhhh noooooooo.

FYI i'm doing it already for another thread anyway so that is patently outrageous to claim, if they haven't done it their VX250 what makes you think it's discrimination.

 

[Erik Mesoy]

Actually it's far more likely that the OP just can't be bothered because it's pedantry, you want it changed you moan. If I'd of done it deliberately fine, but I mean lighten up.

"If I'd of" ???

Now, I can see "If I had done it deliberately", but "If I had of" makes no sense.

Also, we should begin arranging trades, such as "You stop saying 'religon' and we'll stop saying 'athiest'" and "You stop comparing Muslims to Nazis threatening all civilization and we'll stop comparing Bush to Hitler for taking our away our freedoms".

 

[Sidhe]

"If I'd of" ???

Now, I can see "If I had done it deliberately", but "If I had of" makes no sense.

Also, we should begin arranging trades, such as "You stop saying 'religon' and we'll stop saying 'athiest'" and "You stop comparing Muslims to Nazis threatening all civilization and we'll stop comparing Bush to Hitler for taking our away our freedoms".

I spell it how I say it, if you don't like it tough, get a dictionary and go weep into it, I have no time for pedantry, it's childish and pointless and what's more it's against forum rules consider yourself reported.

 

[CurtSibling]

I do not recall any victories at all, either way. I never respond to those threads, anyway.

I was talking about 'real life.' It is a concept some CFCers do not know about.

What are you going to mock atheists about?

The fact that we don't kneel and pray to thin air?

...

 

[VX250]

Atheists need a sense of humor. Most of them are a loathesome bunch.

 

[CurtSibling]

Indeed. We revel in our solemn hideousness.

 

[pboily]

I spell it how I say it, if you don't like it tough, get a dictionary and go weep into it, I have no time for pedantry, it's childish and pointless and what's more it's against forum rules consider yourself reported.

Sidhe, non-english speakers don't pronounce "have" and "of" the same way at all.

 

[Sidhe]

Sidhe, non-english speakers don't pronounce "have" and "of" the same way at all.

So who cares? If you want to be a pedant I'll carry on doing it anyway, so basically don't it's quite simply against forum rules, and I wont stand for it.

 

[pboily]

Sidhe, I couldn't understand what you were saying. It took me a good four reads, and my English is reasonably advanced.

 

[ironduck]

Which leaves you freedom to taunt those who will by your actions find offense, how old are you if you do that, and how old where the Danish comic writers: I'll tell you 5. Wankers. Liberty means responsibility, I hope you get that point, because morons in journalism in the old boys network are still 5, an they'll do something to impress because they never grew up, that isn't freedom of speech that's just I call you a wanker, and you're wrong for taking offense, f*** wit nothing knowless children.

You quoted my post when you wrote this, but I'm not sure if you're telling me something. If you are, please rephrase it as I simply don't have a clue what you're saying.

 

[Heretic_Cata]

Of course they should have a laugh. I make fun of ppl's religions plenty of times.
Besides, God has a british sense of humour; he won't mind.

 

[Erik Mesoy]

I spell it how I say it, if you don't like it tough, get a dictionary and go weep into it, I have no time for pedantry, it's childish and pointless and what's more it's against forum rules consider yourself reported.

Now I'm really confused. I didn't understand what you said, I guessed at what you were trying to say, stated that I didn't understand what you said because it made no sense, and you reported me? Pardon me, but just when did it become against the forum rules to not understand a post?