With the caveat (again) that none of this weird stuff should be paid attention to unless you're already doing all the low-hanging fruit. And, if you have loved ones, helping them do so as well. The seven years that clean air, clean diet, stretching, and exercise buys you at least another 2 years of medical advances, unless an inflection point is reached at then *shrug*.
What's recently become a hot topic is the concept of senolytics. Remember, there is a variety of ways that the body breaks down all at the same time, and so the intervention will be based on what (specifically) is going wrong.
In layman terms, some of our cells get old and start to be 'less good' at keeping their own health in order as well as the local milieu. But, they're taking up space. And a subset of these cells actually have local stem cells available that would be happy to send in young cells to replace them, except the old cells are in the way. This is obviously more about replicating tissue than non-replicating tissue. Muscle, not neurons.
Senolytics would be interventions that cause the 'old' cells to peacefully die (apoptosis, 'peaceful' being the operative word here) and then follow up with some repair/growth signal that causes new stem cell activity to fill in the space. In essence, it would rejuvenate the tissue and slow the aging process. This is what they're finding in intermittent fasting, and I remember being very excited about the original proof-of-concept experiments that removing senescent cells is beneficial. Obviously, small molecule design that mimics the effect is very hard to do, since if you're going to hard-tweak a biochemical pathway in a cell, you want to be very careful which cell you do it in. And so, there have been some spectacular failures in the actual industry. Well, maybe not 'huge failures'. Mostly 'underperform', but that's just normal in pharma. If you ever get optimistic about something moving to human trials, you're making a statistical error. But the future is created by the Greater Fool.