Hercules90
Deity
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2007
- Messages
- 2,557
That's the way it is.
And Yes to proposal
And Yes to proposal
Sry but tbh I don't feel like digging through the thread/event log, so could the proposal state which cities exactly would be affected?
Edit: Going back a page in the thread, Ruff's post of it seeming fair might be interpreted as a vote in favor, but he was also expressing doubt in that same post and he has only been feed Chinese propaganda at that point so his vote wasn't well-informed regardless.
Seems fair ... as long as the 2nd owner (or the oldest owner still alive) is known.
Edit: I vote that the city liberation rule is modified so that the city is liberated to the oldest (still alive) civilization.
Edited my post from before for clarity ...
And so what if my vote seems uninformed. One player, one vote. Or are you trying to disenfranchise me?
Well yeah, but Vietnam is very much the odd man out here, the real issue is the cities of the former Muslim team of which every single member has been completely eliminated.I think it would make more sense to the liberated cities to be returned to the original team, not just someone who happened to conquer it first. For instance Vietnamese cities were part of team Russia but never owned by Russia herself.
Guys, we need a formal vote to amend the house rules about city trading. Some civs no longer exist and it is not possible to return those cities to their original owner. I proposed to accept that in lieu of the original owner -- the second owner get's all the rights of the original owner, and if the third or forth owner decide to "liberate" the city -- they can pass it to the second owner, as per rule 1 from OP. All in favor say Yay, the rest just say Nay, would you?
So according to Imp K proposal, if MIchov (EU empire + Canada) wipes out Russia empire, at his own expense and with no substantial help from another Empire. Those captured cities get re distributed amongst remaining empires. He would feel annoyed. What a load of rubbish.