Donovan Zoi
The Return
Me no care.
Provolution said:No flames from me. But I was indeed unjustly attacked in the outset.
Also, I am never expecting any support from you Blackheart, and you have repeated why several times. No prestige for me in this, I only wanted to give the legislators an idea of what kind of gameworld people wanted, so the laws are made with something in mind.
Again, you did not read the context, and came with guns blazing without understanding the issue, both Cyc and Civanator did so. Why did some people decide to attack anyways?
blackheart said:Where's the discussion for this? Since when has it been OK to poll this huge before discussing it? World settings is NOT a trivial matter, therefore we should discuss it first.
Another point to be made is that it's multiple choice, there's no need for it, you really can't choose a combo of any options for the vote to work properly. But as Cyc says, this will probably used as a precursor poll, not the official one.
And before you respond with a flame Provo, it's constructive criticism.
Ashburnham said:Provo's just too good at making enemies.
For what it's worth, I say Random. We shouldn't construct the world to match what we want, it would be more fun if we have to adapt to an unsure environment.
WeaponX said:Hey hey, quit the fighting. Mindless crap like this is what delays our games. These are just polls to see the basic opinion before a discussion starts. If their is a massive, overwhelming support for one thing it would not need discussion.
blackheart said:Yes it would. Like you said, this is a preliminary poll. This means people haven't had time or a chance to present their points of view, which of course does influence people's votes.
This would be like voting for the president based on his picture alone.
WeaponX said:Hey hey, quit the fighting. Mindless crap like this is what delays our games. These are just polls to see the basic opinion before a discussion starts. If their is a massive, overwhelming support for one thing it would not need discussion.
Provolution said:Thank you for bringing in some neutral sanity here. My point remains. If there is overwhelming support for a proposal, we go for it. If there is question on what to choose, we rediscuss it and repoll it , plain and simple. This thread would have had a different fate if someone else posted.
And you never, EVER would do something like that, would you?Provolution said:But for a neutral poll with no recommendations like this, political character assassination attempts is not really needed.
*flashback time*Provolution said:Ravensfire, when there is something at stake I would, but not for a world preference poll like this, that is just waste of time and overkill and no bearing on the final outcome. At least I time my campaigns with some tangible gains.
Here, it is nothing but personal. Also I have never declared a vendetta on anyone, and my disagreements with you, Ashburnham and many others are long forgotten. However, 2-3 people see my nick as a red cloth they got to attack.
Provolution said:This is exactly why we need the gameworld preferences straight before we complete more of the constiution. Game length, Terms of office and everything is dependent on the Gameworld, in particular World Size, Land Mass and Land Shape.
Provolution said:Well from now on I suggest we limit ourself from commenting each other Blackheart, and if we do, we talk issue, not person, and no allegations from now on ok ?
I will try my best, hopefully you will.
I think many people may agree that I do not spam unless I bicker with you.
In fact I am much more productive than you, and seek to be constructive in proposing some more complete ideas, where all you got is offensive one liners.
I have never seen some solid proposal from you Blackheart, ever.