DG4 Discussion - Const: Article L

[zorven]

Our current Article L based upon the DG2 Constitution:

L. The constitution, laws and standards of Fanatika can never be contrary to the rules and regulations of the Civfanatics forums. Moderators may veto any such constitutional amendments, laws or standards.

 

[GenMarshall]

I can certanly agree to this.

 

[Bootstoots]

I think this is a ridiculous proposal. How dare we even consider it!

Just kidding. Of course we should use this.

 

[zorven]

I don't see any need to change this.

 

[Stuck_as_a_Mac]

Does this one even have to be discussed? As is.

 

[ravensfire]

Poll this sucker!

-- Ravensfire

 

[FortyJ]

Agreed. This should only need to be polled in an Accept vs Reject format.

I second the motion to poll this article.

 

[Cyc]

Of course, this is a standard for all Cons.

 

[Bill_in_PDX]

Done deal

 

[ravensfire]

Well, with Bill chiming in (Hi Bill! ), that's enough for me.

Poll going up ...

-- Ravensfire

 

[ravensfire]

Poll is posted here

-- Ravensfire