• 📚 A new project from the admin: Check out PictureBooks.io, an AI storyteller that lets you create personalized picture books for kids in seconds. Give it a try and let me know what you think!

Did ya ever think......

skadistic

Caomhanach
Joined
May 25, 2004
Messages
15,239
Location
Land of Mary
....meet that special woman, fall in love, have great sex, get married and begin to start your new life together... only to then be told:

You married your twin sister???

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22612314/?gt1=10755

Twins separated at birth meet, get married
British case forces review of rights of children to know identities


LONDON - Twins who were separated at birth got married without realizing they were brother and sister, a lawmaker said, urging more information be provided on birth certificates for adopted children.

A court annulled the British couple's union after they discovered their true relationship, Lord David Alton said.

"Everyone has a right to knowledge about their lineage, genealogy and identity. And if they don't, then it will lead to cases of incest," Alton said during a telephone interview Friday.
Story continues below ↓advertisement

Alton first revealed details of the unusual case last month during a five-hour debate about a bill that would change regulations about human embryology.

"I was recently involved in a conversation with a High Court judge who was telling me of a case he had dealt with," Alton said according to a transcript of the Dec. 10 debate. "It involved the normal birth of twins who were separated at birth and adopted by separate parents.

"They were never told that they were twins," Alton said. "They met later in life and felt an inevitable attraction, and the judge had to deal with the consequences of the marriage that they entered into and all the issues of their separation."

Alton gave no additional details and would not reveal the name of the judge who told him about the case.

The High Court's Family Division declined to discuss or confirm Alton's account about the twins.

A child's right to know
Alton, an independent legislator who works at Liverpool's John Moores University, said the siblings' inadvertent marriage raises the wider issue of the importance of strengthening the rights of children to know the identities of their biological parents, including kids who were born through in vitro fertilization.

Under British law, only a mother has to be named on a birth certificate. Such certificates also are not required to identify births that result from IVF or to identify the sperm donor.

In addition, British law does not require parents to ever tell children that they were the result of donated sperm.

Alton believes this should be changed.

Alton said he favors an amendment to the Human Fertility and Embryology bill — which is still being debated in the House of Lords — that would require birth certificates of children born from donated sperm to say that and to identify the genetic father.

Referring to the twins' case, he said: "If you start trying to conceal someone's identity, sooner or later the truth will come out. And if you don't know you are biologically related to someone, you may become attracted to them and tragedies like this may occur."
I don't know what I would do.
 
That would be really....disgusting

You can almost here the guy shouting

"I DID MY SISTER!!!!!"
 
A la Joe Dirt.

"Would it help if you went back to thinking I was your sister?"
 
In the words of Aerosmith.

Ain't no better lovin' then your sister or your cousin.........................
 
The thing that I find odd is that they're saying they're now reviewing the right of children to know their biological parents. They should be reviewing the law on marriage, because that's where the hassles come from (their marriage was annulled).

As far as the law is concerned, knowing your biological parents wouldn't help here anyway - I mean, people would probably still remain together. It's not something you discuss on a first date, so it'd still only come up when you're already in a relationship. It would just mean you lose your right to get married. In fact, from this point of view it's best for them to never find out.
 
Nothing new, this once happened a long time ago...
435_leia_luke_kiss.jpg

[insert southern joke here]


Freaks me out. I have 2 sisters. *shudders* this would suck to find out.
 
They need to make sure the sperm donor doesn't become financially responsible for the children. Something like this happened in Sweden, but he knew the lesbian couple and wasn't just some anonymous guy who jacked off into a cup.

He wasn't responsible since he was the biological parent, but the two women were the actual parents, but the courts thought otherwise.
 
I call BS.


This entire article is evidently based on claims by one legislator, one who happens to be working towards birth certificate reform. "Well, my judge friend told about this one couple who..."

Yeah right.


Maybe it's just me, but I find it highly unlikely that a pair of twins separated at birth will not only happen to come across each other randomly, but will then fall in love, and then get serious enough to actually marry, all without having a single inkling that they could be related. "Wow! We have the same birthday! And we're both adopted! From the same adoption agency too! Fancy that! Shall we have some tea before we get squelchy?"

Jesus, next thing you know, this article will be the second most popular article on CNN.


Wait.
 
I call BS.


This entire article is evidently based on claims by one legislator, one who happens to be working towards birth certificate reform. "Well, my judge friend told about this one couple who..."

Yeah right.


Maybe it's just me, but I find it highly unlikely that a pair of twins separated at birth will not only happen to come across each other randomly, but will then fall in love, and then get serious enough to actually marry, all without having a single inkling that they could be related. "Wow! We have the same birthday! And we're both adopted! From the same adoption agency too! Fancy that! Shall we have some tea before we get squelchy?"

Jesus, next thing you know, this article will be the second most popular article on CNN.


Wait.

One could have been born 11:59PM and the other 12:01 AM. And, only one may have been adopted. The other might have stayed with parents.
 
I really don't know what I would do...

If this actually happened to me I would probably be completely immobilized (both physically and emotionally) for a few days due to the immense, devastating emotional shock. I would probably be out of commission for a week at least, since I imagine the stress would cause me to become physically sick.

Goddamn, that is just so crazy. Thank you for this madness, skadistic.
 
It's hard to comprehend really because most of us haven't been adopted - if we had, we'd at least know that there's that part of us which is unknown.

I think I'd be astonished at the seemingly unlikely coincidence, but I don't know if I'd be sickened by anything; this wouldn't have been someone I'd been brought up with.

To put it another way - supposing you found out that you were adopted, so that your sister wasn't in fact your biological sister. Might you then suddenly start fancying her, with no odd feelings about it? Obviously from a having-children point of view, it's the genetics that matter, but our natural reactions I'd have thought seem to work in terms of who we _think_ our siblings are, i.e., who we are brought up with.
 
There are studies that confirm this - aversion comes not from having the same parents, but from watching them receive parental care.

Heck, the health risks from full siblings having children, for one generation, isn't even that high. If this happened to anyone, and they went ahead and stayed married anyways, I wouldn't be at all surprised.
 
Back
Top Bottom