1. We have added the ability to collapse/expand forum categories and widgets on forum home.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Photobucket has changed its policy concerning hotlinking images and now requires an account with a $399.00 annual fee to allow hotlink. More information is available at: this link.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. All Civ avatars are brought back and available for selection in the Avatar Gallery! There are 945 avatars total.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. To make the site more secure, we have installed SSL certificates and enabled HTTPS for both the main site and forums.
    Dismiss Notice
  5. Civ6 is released! Order now! (Amazon US | Amazon UK | Amazon CA | Amazon DE | Amazon FR)
    Dismiss Notice
  6. Dismiss Notice
  7. Forum account upgrades are available for ad-free browsing.
    Dismiss Notice

Differences and Similarities between American and Soviet Science and Industry in WWII

Discussion in 'World History' started by bombshoo, Jan 18, 2010.

  1. bombshoo

    bombshoo Never mind...

    Jan 7, 2003
    The Soviet Union was supposedly a socialist, top-down run economy, even throughout WWII, while at the same time the United States was at least capitalist in theory. How did the different economic (and to an extent political) systems effect how they ran their wartime industries and specifically, how they ran their scientific research programs throughout the war? I'm aware the Manhattan Project was government project but in the United States did democracy and the free market have any real effects on how the program itself was run? On the flipside, how did the top-down, one-party system effect Soviet developments in the same fields? Which was better for scientific research and wartime mobilization of resources if either?

    Edit: I apologize for some typos. I have had a little to drink and this question is mostly based off of some drunken debate amongst friends.
  2. Cutlass

    Cutlass The Man Who Wasn't There.

    Jan 13, 2008
    US of A
    The US industrial war fighting effort was top down as well. The economy wasn't "nationalized" as in taken from the owners, but it was very substantially centrally planned to maximize output for the war.


Share This Page