That's what I was meaning to say.Organisms don't evolve, species do.
How so?But it isn't in the same way.
Yes that's waht I was saying.And if "evolution" refers to "change over time", then yes, religions (and other human institutions, such as government and culture) change over time.
Read above....huh? What do you mean, evolve? Something like memes or whatnot?
protestants are an evolutionary step of catholicism.
Maybe in 1520, but not in 2000. They've got too many nutty subgroups to be evolved.

A result of the Protestant Explosion![]()

Not if you go far enough, you are bound to find something in which could cause a religion to evolve.It is trivial to prove this as both religions and species have changed from what they were in some point in the past.
Not always, take the current pope for example. He still a bit nutty.Catholicism has filled the rationality niches, though![]()
Not if you go far enough, you are bound to find something in which could cause a religion to evolve.

Not always, take the current pope for example. He still a bit nutty.
I saying like, if religion A believes in a doctrine but Event A and/or religion B comes into contact, it may cause it to mutate and thus creating a fission or even a total separation to occur. The Religions adapt to what environment they are in and will react when a variable changes, added or removed.
Does not compute.
I saying like, if religion A believes in a doctrine but Event A and/or religion B comes into contact, it may cause it to mutate and thus creating a fission or even a total separation to occur. The Religions adapt to what environment they are in and will react when a variable changes, added or removed.
I'll give you that up to an extent, in comparison to the last pope, he is to total nut job.Eh, in retrospect he's not as bad as a pope possibly could be. At least he's not bad as the popes that condemned ideas of democracy and the enlightenment.
I give you this in some cases, but I do say that the Protestants of the Great Awakening, for example, were a rather good influence and helped create and empower liberalism as it is today.Compared to the nuttiness of Pentecostalism, and the warped ideology of the few protestant churches which actually think that keeping material wealth and not helping people in need is a good thing, it's got nothing.
That's basically it. What I am asking for is some YEC and/or anti evolutionist person to come out and refute this claim. Of which, they don't seem to be confident to answer in this thread.Religions change over time in order to adapt to differing environments, just like species. Any general world history book will give plenty examples of various religions adapting to new events and situations.