Do you prefer to win by Conquest?

Do you prefer to win by military conquest?

  • Yes! Smashing my opponents is the best!

    Votes: 13 31.0%
  • Well, sometimes when I feel for it.

    Votes: 15 35.7%
  • No, I like to build up my civ in peace.

    Votes: 14 33.3%

  • Total voters
    42
I like to build up peacefully as long as I can. If a civ attacks me or threatens me or somhow goes to war with me, I'll either crush them or hurt them really bad, if in modern ages more so. But I try not to start wars, unless the civ is always testing my patiences then I piss them off and get them to start a war in which case I cream them!!! :)
 
Conquest is mine.

I love by the Modern Age theres normally 7 surviving civs with me and it usually breaks down to me + 3 others fighting the rest we a few turn coats on both sides. Very fun to see the AI fighting on a global scale.

.... Until ICBMs come along and someone finally uses them, not long until global warming goes through the roof and I have to secure ROPs with everyone and send in hordes of workers to clean up the mess :)
 
I like to make the game interesting by allowing some of my cities to get captured...then return with a large arm in the Morden era and conquer that stupid civ who thought that I was weak....yes I get a kick out of it. :mwaha:
 
I love winning by anything but conquest. But if anyone or anything ticks me off they are so dead (that way I have a legitamate excuse to take their land for resourses :D ).
 
I don't normally play to the ultra-boring modern age. But when I desperatly want to win, I almost always go for conquest. I hate building. I like war! :evil: :soldier: :tank:
 
I prefer culture. It's simply the best way to win when you're a perfectionist and builder like me.

Shame on all you warmongerers! Try to appreciate a little peace and oh, say, civilization instead of acting like barbarians! ;)
 
Good to see it is many Conquest guys out there. It seems to be just as normal as the opposite or the playstyle between.

I find it so much easier to win by conquest. I feel it is wrong not to try expanding the border at all times. I mean if you use all your resources and population producing military and win, then you can build up your civ in peace (and alone) if you bother.
Last time I played the Persians on Monarch - I had wiped out all civs around 800AD. This was on a Tine pangea map, but my Immortals were just unstoppable.
 
I play on the larger maps so I find Conquest a bit tedious moving the troups around! I also like to build my civ, and I find it hard to do both.
 
Top Bottom