1. We have added the ability to collapse/expand forum categories and widgets on forum home.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Photobucket has changed its policy concerning hotlinking images and now requires an account with a $399.00 annual fee to allow hotlink. More information is available at: this link.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. All Civ avatars are brought back and available for selection in the Avatar Gallery! There are 945 avatars total.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. To make the site more secure, we have installed SSL certificates and enabled HTTPS for both the main site and forums.
    Dismiss Notice
  5. Civ6 is released! Order now! (Amazon US | Amazon UK | Amazon CA | Amazon DE | Amazon FR)
    Dismiss Notice
  6. Dismiss Notice
  7. Forum account upgrades are available for ad-free browsing.
    Dismiss Notice

Do you think this expansion will be ''the ultimate Civ5'' (like Civ4's BTS)?

Discussion in 'Civ5 - General Discussions' started by JaGarLo, Feb 27, 2012.

?

Do you think G&K will be the ultimate expansion for Civ5?

  1. Yes!! It's going to be awesome! Civ5 at it's best!

    60 vote(s)
    35.3%
  2. Nah, it will need another expansion...

    81 vote(s)
    47.6%
  3. Nah, Civ5 is good but not as good as Civ4.

    15 vote(s)
    8.8%
  4. Civ5 sucked. G&K can't help something that is already broken.

    14 vote(s)
    8.2%
  1. MARDUK80

    MARDUK80 Chieftain

    Joined:
    May 13, 2011
    Messages:
    459
    Location:
    Finland
    You do not like even one idea of them? :)

    I think -Two UUs and one UB or UI to every Civilization- would be usefull. Make Civs even more unique and with two unique units the unique abilities could be more flexible - more peace orientated and variable.

    Scenario with american indians would be fun surely. Seems like indians are very popular among CivFans, so I am sure this would be "a hit". :)
     
  2. seasnake

    seasnake Conquistador

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    1,778
    Location:
    California, United States
    I don't know, I like the idea of some civs having the longer-term bonuses of buildings/improvements and others lending themselves to two UUs. Really works well so far, I don't know what UB/UI would have worked for Denmark but the Beserkers/Ski Infantry combo is freaking deadly. Likewise, I can't think of two particular good UUs for Songhai but the combo of a great UU and the ever-useful Mud Pyramid Mosque is pretty stunning.
     
  3. AbsintheRed

    AbsintheRed Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2009
    Messages:
    7,909
    Location:
    Szeged, Hungary
    Huhh?? :crazyeye:
    Out of all those things only the health for cities and the war weariness are Civ IV specific
     
  4. aluelkdf

    aluelkdf Chieftain

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2012
    Messages:
    420
    I don't think this will be the ultimate expansion. It will be pretty good and worth the money. But if you want to get the ultimate, your going to have to by 5 DLC's that come out in the year after Gods and Kings release.
     
  5. KokeenoPokameso

    KokeenoPokameso Chieftain

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2012
    Messages:
    123
    Location:
    Ontario Canada
    Nah, Civ5 is good but not as good as Civ4.
    :deadhorse:
    When Civ V was released it was broken, almost unplayable. After a long absents I have returned to Civ V and was pleasantly surprised that with With recent patches it is more playable. core game elements are still missing . (corruption, health:health:, war weariness:c5war: etc.) I don't see how more expansions can fix these core problems.
    Civ V is an OK game but it is not Civ IV.
     
  6. Buccaneer

    Buccaneer Chieftain

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2001
    Messages:
    3,562
    Civ4 is also not Civ5, and thus for many, the detrimental effect of even thinking about going back to playing Civ4. There may have been things "missing" (if they even have a place in the game) but the significant changes far outweighed them.
     
  7. janboruta

    janboruta Artistriarch

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2011
    Messages:
    2,129
    Location:
    Tarnów, Poland
    I think, and this is an opinion I'm really entitled to, that Civ 4 and Civ 5 are both completely different games with different base ideas and goals. The only thing you can compare is the quality of execution by the devs, but comparing ideas and mechanics in games that are built upon different concepts is slightly unjustified. It's obvious that Civ 5 was never going to be a faithful sequel only with better graphics. And one can always come back to Civ 4, even if it's graphically outdated (though light-hearted and often hilarious leaderheads stay fresh and will stay fresh).

    I don't think that Gods & Kings will be the ultimate Civ 5, as one can imagine few more mechanics that could be implemented. However, with this expansion pack Civ 5 will certainly feel more polished and complete. Religion itself brings back loads of (oddly, a fraction of Civ 4's) flavour, but in a new and refreshing form. Revamped and easier-to-manage espionage is also a very strong point of the EP.
     
  8. Dregor

    Dregor Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2006
    Messages:
    110
    As long as they don't decide to try corporations again, then sure. I'd like to see more leaders for existing civs, with their own unique abilities.
     
  9. Oohforf

    Oohforf Praise loud, blame soft.

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2010
    Messages:
    321
    Location:
    In that corrupted Ontario south.
    Where's the "I'm a complete skeptic when it comes to this" option?
     
  10. Aquila SPQR

    Aquila SPQR Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2009
    Messages:
    462
    Location:
    Central Europe
    I always wonder why they are adding only those religions that exists to this day. Why not include ancient egyptian (lasted longer than christianity) or greek one?
     
  11. Louis XXIV

    Louis XXIV Le Roi Soleil

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2003
    Messages:
    13,579
    Location:
    Norfolk, VA
    I think the idea is that the "founded religion" is something that has lasted (because, in game, they'll continue to last). You do have an option to found a pantheon, in which case, you'll have an Ancient Egyptian or Greek pantheon represented. But these were often national religions, which kind of defeats the point of having missionaries and using them in diplomacy.
     
  12. KokeenoPokameso

    KokeenoPokameso Chieftain

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2012
    Messages:
    123
    Location:
    Ontario Canada
    Yes you are wright one can not make a direct comparison between Civ V & IV They are different games.

    However I still feel there are Things missing from Civ V. A game mechanic to assess the over all well being of a city. Happiness:c5happy: as a global measurement is frustrating because I don't see why :c5happy: in one city should effect the overall well being of another city.

    Also there seems to be a missing mechanic to discourage prolonged and needless war. I often find I keep fighting a neighboring Civ long after I have any intention of taking more cities just so I can promote units.
     
  13. Inhalaattori

    Inhalaattori Chieftain

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2003
    Messages:
    1,269
    Location:
    Up North
    There are only 3 scenarios in this expansion so it is totally possible they will make a second expansions that has less stuff to normal game, but more scenarios. There are lots of possibilities for good scenarios:

    The Rise of Rome, US civil war, colonization style scenario, WW1, WW2 etc.
     
  14. Buccaneer

    Buccaneer Chieftain

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2001
    Messages:
    3,562
    As to happiness, you answered your own question. It was not frustrating in Civ4 but it can become a challenge in Civ5, thus limiting your second point (where you have to stop warfare because of happiness issues). I think they should make it a little more harder (e.g., more penalties for going unhappy) but it's a great change.
     
  15. apocalypse105

    apocalypse105 Chieftain

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    2,704
    No the unhappiness penalties are allready good enough
     
  16. MkLh

    MkLh Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2008
    Messages:
    903
    Location:
    Finland
    I don't think either an expansion will ever make V as good as IV. The problem is that every single core design choice on V, expect 1UP, is inferior to its counterpart on IV. For example, global happiness is vastly inferior mechanism compared to IVs city and civic maintenance, but as it's a core mechanism, it won't be removed. An expansion may still make V better than it's now though.
     
  17. King William I

    King William I Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2012
    Messages:
    419
    Location:
    Kentucky
    There's already a coloniztion senario
     
  18. Pitboss

    Pitboss Chieftain

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2006
    Messages:
    299
    Location:
    Belgium
    The second expansion for CIV5, that I'm assuming is coming, could bring back the features that were introduced in in the 2nd expansion of CIV4. Allowing for surrendering, vassal states and everything else that wasn't put in the base version of CIV5.

    So ... ultimate civ5 expansion ... ?
    I don't think so.
    But keep on trying though!

    It might be the "alpha centauri" in me talking but I'ld wish they tried to make civilization more about developing one then trying to just replay history. That would open the door to a more creative approach. That does not keep on stopping when you launch your spacecraft.
     
  19. MkLh

    MkLh Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2008
    Messages:
    903
    Location:
    Finland
    I don't think there will ever be vassal states on CIV5. The concept is too close to puppet states and would cause confusion. The words "vassal state" and "puppet state" have the same meaning basically.
     
  20. Louis XXIV

    Louis XXIV Le Roi Soleil

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2003
    Messages:
    13,579
    Location:
    Norfolk, VA
    While they do, I would make the suggestion that the puppet cities reflect more closely autonomous cities within an Empire. Such cities have existed throughout history, but are learned most commonly with the Holy Roman Empire (however, Tyre was such an example in the Assyrian Empire, for example).

    However, you are right. From a name perspective, it might be too difficult to draw the distinction. However, I have a modest suggestion in the subforum that uses City-States to reflect vassals. It is essentially a puppet leader, however, so perhaps I'm blending them together too much as well.
     

Share This Page