1. We have added the ability to collapse/expand forum categories and widgets on forum home.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. All Civ avatars are brought back and available for selection in the Avatar Gallery! There are 945 avatars total.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. To make the site more secure, we have installed SSL certificates and enabled HTTPS for both the main site and forums.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Civ6 is released! Order now! (Amazon US | Amazon UK | Amazon CA | Amazon DE | Amazon FR)
    Dismiss Notice
  5. Dismiss Notice
  6. Forum account upgrades are available for ad-free browsing.
    Dismiss Notice

Does the Civ V tech tree even make sense?

Discussion in 'Civ5 - General Discussions' started by DarkSchneider, Jan 3, 2011.

  1. DarkSchneider

    DarkSchneider Chieftain

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2001
    Messages:
    739
    Location:
    Burlington, VT
    I was just reading another post about the silliness, of the Civ V tech tree, and it got me to thinking about comparing the Civ V tech tree to the original Civ I. The most significant technological advancement in Civ I (and possibly Civ V) is the Railroad, so I thought I good place to start would be the advancements required to get that.

    In Civ I, to get the Railroad, you needed (working backwards): Steam Engine, Bridge Building, Physics, Invention, Iron Working, Alphabet, Mathematics, Navigation, Engineering, Literacy, Bronze Working, Masonry, Mapmaking, Astronomy, The Wheel, Construction, Writing, Code of Laws, Mysticism, Currency, Ceremonial Burial.

    Of those, only Astronomy, Mysticism and Ceremonial Burial feel out of place, since the eventual development of the Railroad could have occured without them.

    In Civ V we have, as a requirement for Railroad, every Ancient, Classical, and Medieval Technology, in addition to every Renaissance Era technology with the exception of Fertilizer, Metallurgy, Rifling and Archaeology. Which means the following technologies are responsible for the Railroad in the Civ V tech tree: Acoustics, Astronomy, Gunpowder, Theology, Chivalry, Civil Service, Optics, Philosophy, Horseback Riding, Trapping, Calender, Sailing, Animal Husbandry and Archery.

    Really does that even make sense? How do any of those contribute to the understanding needed to build a railroad? Why can't a railroad exist in a world without Religion, Weapons or Horses?

    The other thing that bugs me about the Civ V is that I inevitably get to a point where the entire scientific advancement of my Civilization is bottlenecked at ... Acoustics.
     
  2. hardcore_gamer

    hardcore_gamer Chieftain

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2009
    Messages:
    672
    The biggest problem I have with the tech tree in Civ 5 aren't really the techs them self's, but how linear the tech tree is.

    For example, it isn't possible to go straight for the nuclear techs to obtain nuclear weapons faster then normal at the expense of falling behind in other techs, you are pretty much just required to research every tech before you can advance to the more advanced ones and that takes away a lot of the strategy. Not to mention that it makes each civ feel more or less the same in terms of technology, you will rarely see armies with outdated infantry but advanced tanks or state of the art air forces supported by WW 2 era navies. Every civ is pretty much on the same level of tech unless it falls behind for whatever reason. It almost feels like you are researching era's Age of Empire's 2 style rather then individual techs.
     
  3. JohnnyW

    JohnnyW Gave up on this game

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2010
    Messages:
    658
    Location:
    USA
    I agree with your thoughts, but I do wonder how odd prereqs can be totally avoided when you're talking about Ancient -> Modern techs. The tree is pretty long at that point.
     
  4. CHEESE!

    CHEESE! On a long nostalgia trip

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2007
    Messages:
    2,213
    Gender:
    Male
    I kinda like that. I feel it simulates the actual path of nations, rather than being able to make massive leaps of logic and common sense (no, Hunting isn't strictly -necessary- to understand Nuclear Fission, but really, are you going to be able to understand the latter without being able to understand the former?). Plus, each tech is now useful-ish, so you don't have the Archery or Theology miss-outs like you did in CivIV.

    Also, I never liked -having- to tech Alphabet as the Chinese.
     
  5. DarkSchneider

    DarkSchneider Chieftain

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2001
    Messages:
    739
    Location:
    Burlington, VT
    I think the best way to make the tech tree is to keep it completely logical in its interdependencies, but to keep the research times so that it is advantageous to research less complicated technology earlier. That way players can bee-line if they have a specific strategy, but are still encouraged to take a more well-rounded approach.
     
  6. Venereus

    Venereus This Is Streamlined!

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2010
    Messages:
    1,026
    But then you'll need to balance the GS again! The easier you make it to beeline something, the more dangerously imbalanced the Great Scientists become.:sad:
     
  7. DarkSchneider

    DarkSchneider Chieftain

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2001
    Messages:
    739
    Location:
    Burlington, VT
    I think I would make the great scientists do something completely different than they do now. Actually, I think I would do that for all of the great people. If the great scientist still researches things, there should be a cap on teh total number of beakers he can provide.
     
  8. Harvestmoon

    Harvestmoon Chieftain

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2010
    Messages:
    62
    I've never "liked" the Civ tech trees. I think any tech should be researchable at any time, but techs should give bonuses to research in order to make acquiring a tech feasible.

    Like, 4000 BC, researching Satellites should take like 5,000 turns. But, by the time you have Rockets, you're getting a huge % bonus to research toward Satellites, bringing its generic research time somewhere around 12-20 turns.

    This way, there's no path you MUST take. If you've just dusted off all the Classical techs and you want to get Gunpowder, you could go for it, though it might take 45-60 turns... making it a stupid choice when Renaissance techs have been reduced to a handful of turns by the bonuses from your Classical techs.

    Great Scientists should add huge % bonuses to science research in the empire for 10-20 turns, simulating a lifelong influence on the nation's research. So, popping them could either give you a tile of +Science (like the GS in CiV) or a Scienctific Golden Age (we could call it a Paradigm Shift)

    ...hm... that was all off the cuff... extending the idea out, Generals could be popped for an empire-wide combat bonus, like a Military Golden Age (Age of Conquest). Merchants a gold boost (Economic Boom). Artists a Culture boost (Renaissance). Etc.
     
  9. D_Toccs

    D_Toccs Chieftain

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2010
    Messages:
    21
    Harvetsmoon, That is possibly the best idea ever for a tech tree. Kudos to you sir.
     
  10. SammyKhalifa

    SammyKhalifa Warlord

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2003
    Messages:
    3,402
    You're going to build satellites without metal? I'm guessing you'll figure out a thing or two about mathematics on the way, too.
     
  11. wurstburst

    wurstburst Chieftain

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2009
    Messages:
    301
    The problem derives from the fact that there just aren't enough techs. Too few techs made them have a very narrow tech tree, which made beelines very powerful and deep, which forced them to add dependencies, which made it so that you pretty much had to complete an era to move to the next, which gave everything a very linear feel.

    More techs with less dependencies would go a long way to adding strategic depth to the game.
     
  12. Poke

    Poke Chieftain

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2010
    Messages:
    168
    This is something fundamental to civ games. All research is very teleological, a completely defined end goal and solution, and comes in discrete steps. Real world, it's pretty blind, you can have a goal, but the path reaching it is less than definite, there's always alternate ways of reaching it. Often research paths lead to deadends, but they can also become steps for other technologies
    With the satellites example. Having that as a goal would mean that the caveman looking at the sky must know a priori what space is, and the significance or satellites. In going for this goal, you'd develop the interim technologies, rocketry, physics and all the interim techs on the typical civ tree. It's the same as setting a research goal, really. The steps in developing each interim tech add up to the 5000 turns
     
  13. Frozensky

    Frozensky Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2011
    Messages:
    50
    It's really more of a tech ladder. You don't branch off; you simply climb it to the top by using each rung.

    Although the game does have a tree in place, and that's social policies.

    Maybe if the tech tree were more like that? Where you pick a concept and then further in is the applications of that concept? For example, let's say combustion is a concept. Well, you could then go to the next concept (Flight), or go further into combustion to get the tank units.

    Something a bored modder could try on a rainy day, but I digress.
     
  14. UWHabs

    UWHabs Warlord

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2008
    Messages:
    3,230
    Location:
    Toronto
    I love the GP effects you mention. Something like:
    Scientific GA: +25% science
    Economic boom: each tile with 1 coin gets +1 coin (like the current GA)
    Renaissance: +25% culture
    Age of Conquest: +15% military boost
    Industrial revolution (Great Engineer): each tile with 1 hammer gets +1 (like the current one)
    Prosperity (?) (Happiness GA): +25% growth rate in all cities

    As for the tech tree, that makes sense but there's too many techs to make it work (I mean, if Rocketry then Satelites would take 25 turns total, but Satelites alone takes 30, why not just keep the pre-req there?)
     
  15. JohnnyW

    JohnnyW Gave up on this game

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2010
    Messages:
    658
    Location:
    USA
    /agreed with this.

    How silly would it be to know banking without currency? Or physics without mathematics? C'mon...
     
  16. Renergy

    Renergy Chieftain

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2010
    Messages:
    197
    Location:
    Czech Republic
    Excellent, terrific, wonderful idea! I'm all for this. :thumbsup::bowdown::clap::worship: The great persons would become much more balanced - now it's imo only GE (for rushing wonders) and GS (for techs) that are valuable. Artists and Merchants are nice, but way below GE/GS.

    EDIT: Created a separate thread for this idea:
    http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=406982

    Regarding the tech tree - one thing that stands out for me is that it's possible to build e.g. Great Lighthouse/Great Library - heck even Sistine Chapel - without knowing masonry.


    EDIT: Speaking of Great persons - sorry for OT - but I do miss something like "Great entertainer". He/she should be able to build something like landmark/manufactory, only that the improved hex would provide additional happiness (+5 seems reasonable to me) when within borders.
     
  17. tylor

    tylor Chieftain

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    109
    I recycle vast majority of my GP fo Gold Ages.
     
  18. Harvestmoon

    Harvestmoon Chieftain

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2010
    Messages:
    62
    Well, I had hoped to describe it being so prohibitive to research things without what we consider now as "prerequisite techs" that the game would end before you could accomplish it.

    So, researching Satellites without Rockets would automatically take 5,000 turns. Researching Rocketry without Combustion would take a similarly exhaustive and prohibitive amount of time.

    Basically, instead of making prerequisite techs compulsory, just make them EXTREMELY helpful, but allow for some thing to slide past.

    For instance, you could develop Writing without Pottery, but it would take an extra 10 turns. If you have Pottery though, your research time on Writing is reduced by 10 turns. Extend the logic outward to Satellites, and it's 440 turns with none of the prerequisites, making it ridiculous to even consider, but with each of those prerequisite techs subtracting X turns from the research time.

    So, if you have a high-science civilization and want to skip Radio, you could, but the research time for Satellites would be increased by X turns. Just adds a bit of depth and strategy to it, is all.
     
  19. Harvestmoon

    Harvestmoon Chieftain

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2010
    Messages:
    62
    Thanks! :)

    Yeah, something along those lines. If each Great Person sparked a unique sort of Golden Age benefit, it would be coolbeans.
     
  20. Harvestmoon

    Harvestmoon Chieftain

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2010
    Messages:
    62
    As silly as it is to build the Great Library without Masonry?
    Seriously, though... let's say Banking has a base research time of 100 turns. Currency could subtract 50 from that, Chivalry (for whatever reason) could subtract 10, and Education could subtract 20. Now, if you have those techs, it only takes 20 turns for Banking, but you COULD have skipped them if you had the :c5science: to handle the offset.
     

Share This Page