Eat Bananas? You might be funding TERRORISM!

Is it wrong for Chiquita to pay off guerillas for the safety of thier employees?


  • Total voters
    29

Che Guava

The Juicy Revolutionary
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
5,955
Location
Hali-town,
Columbian militias get paid with Chiqita dollars!

Chiquita: $25M fine for terror payments


WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Banana producer Chiquita will pay a $25 million fine and serve five years' probation for once paying millions of dollars to groups in Colombia considered by the U.S. to be terrorist organizations, a Department of Justice spokesman said Tuesday.

In so doing, the banana producer avoided prosecution for the company's now-defunct payoff of Colombian terrorists protecting its most profitable banana-growing operation, according to terms of a plea agreement with the U.S. Justice Department.

If approved by U.S. courts, the $25 million fine would represent the largest U.S. criminal penalty ever imposed under federal global terrorism sanction regulations, said Justice spokesman Dean Boyd. The regulations prohibit transactions with people who commit, threaten to commit or support U.S.-designated terrorists and establish penalties for doing so.

Attorneys from the Justice Department's National Security Division and federal prosecutors for the District of Columbia filed a joint sentencing motion Tuesday asking the court to accept the plea agreement, which was reached March 19, Boyd said. A hearing on the matter is set for Monday.

In its motion, the government asked that Chiquita Brands International be fined and sentenced to probation, as well as being required to implement an effective ethics program in connection with the company's guilty plea, Boyd said.

Federal prosecutors accused the Cincinnati-based company of paying more than $1.7 million to the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia, a right-wing paramilitary group, in two parts of Colombia where the company grew bananas.

The payments to the group, known as the AUC, went through the company's Colombian subsidiary, Banadex, from 1997 to 2004, according to court documents filed in the case.

Court papers also say Chiquita paid Colombia's two leftist guerrilla groups, the FARC (Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia) and ELN (National Liberation Army) from about 1989 to 1997. At the time, according to court documents, those groups controlled areas where the company grew bananas.

The AUC, FARC and ELN are all combatants in Colombia's decade-long civil war, and all have been designated as terrorist organizations by the United States.

In a written statement issued in March, Chiquita Brands International CEO Fernando Aguirre said the company viewed the plea agreement "as a reasoned solution to the dilemma the company faced several years ago." The company voluntarily disclosed the payments to the Justice Department in 2003, he said, adding the payments were made "to protect the lives of its employees."

Court documents said the company began making the payments after a Banadex general manager met with the then-leader of the AUC, Carlos Castano. Castano told the manager that the AUC was preparing to drive FARC from Colombia's Uraba region and asked for payments to be made to the AUC through private security companies.

"Castano sent an unspoken but clear message that failure to make the payments could result in physical harm to Banadex personnel and property," court documents said.

Charges filed in the case said senior company executives knew about the payments to the AUC and, while checks were written to the security companies, the companies provided no actual services. In 2002, after the U.S. government designated the AUC as a terrorist organization, Chiquita began paying the organization in cash, according to court documents, and continued the payments even after being told by outside counsel that the payments were illegal and should be stopped.

In the motion filed Tuesday, federal prosecutors noted Chiquita's cooperation in the investigation and its voluntary disclosure of its illegal activity, Boyd said. While the government considered filing additional charges in the matter, it decided not to "after an extensive investigation and after considering critical evidence and information that Chiquita provided through its post-plea cooperation," he said.

Chiquita sold Banadex to another company more than two years ago but remains one of the largest purchasers of bananas in Colombia

link

At least they're fair, giving both sides equal access for 'protection money'!

But what do you think of the ruling? Is it fair to penalize a company like Chiquita for trying to protect thier employees in (probably) the most effective way possible?
 
Paying for guards / militia to protect the employees is one thing; paying off thugs to not attack (and in turn, use that money to kill other people) is another.

Thankfully, I don't eat bananas. I do have a banana fone tho.
 
I think it's okay - Colombia is messed up atm. I could see myself doing the same.
Bananas are my favorite food so even if it was made by spraying the blood of new borns over soil, I still don't think I would stop eating them :(
 
I think it's okay - Colombia is messed up atm. I could see myself doing the same.
Bananas are my favorite food so even if it was made by spraying the blood of new borns over soil, I still don't think I would stop eating them :(

OUCH! Remind me not to get between you and a bowl of fruit! ;)
 
Well, it seems like Chiquita is being just about blackmailed here; they don't have a whole lot of choices other than to simply stop doing business in Colombia or sacrifice the safety of their employees...

I guess I don't really have an answer for you, but then, I don't eat bananas, either.
 
Well, it seems like Chiquita is being just about blackmailed here; they don't have a whole lot of choices other than to simply stop doing business in Colombia or sacrifice the safety of their employees...

I think that you might have hit on something here...! ;)

Seriously though, if you can't provide for your own security in a country without paying off de facto mobsters, I think it might be time to move on. I'm sure that a move like that wouldn't do much good for columbia's economy, but on the other hand, I don't think there's must reason to tackle issues like this if everyone decides to play ball with the militias.

I guess I don't really have an answer for you, but then, I don't eat bananas, either.

First they came for the Bananas, but I did not eat bananas so I said nothing, then they came for the oranges...

;)
 
I'm sure that a move like that wouldn't do much good for columbia's economy, but on the other hand, I don't think there's must reason to tackle issues like this if everyone decides to play ball with the militias.

The thousands (millions?) of dollars given to the organized crime syndicate... What do you think this did for the Colombian economy? The poisons that ran off the 1000s of acres of monocropped bananas (devastating biodiversity and poisoning the rural poor)? The synthetic fertilizers that caused the cultural eutrophication of lakes and rivers? The deforestation to get the whole operation going in the first place? Oh, but they paid a couple people a few pesos to be exposed to mutagenic biocides (and carry it home on their cloths for their families to enjoy). Those pesos feed the now cancer ridden family.

Almost forgot! What about all the local bananas that could no longer be sold at the local markets, because the industrial ones are so much cheaper. Does the destruction of the local market get quantified in "affects on economy"? Do any of the environmental factors? At least we should quantify the death and destruction caused directly by the payments made to mobsters.

I think it is painfully obvious who is benefiting from the Chiquita banana machine: chiquita and mobsters. And we think it could be bad for the Colombian economy if they left?
 
:banana: :banana: :banana:

OMG TERRORISTZ!!!oneonethreetimespi

Seems like Chiquita doesn't have a whole lot of options. It's probably much cheaper just to pay off everyone and tell them to fight elsewhere than it would be to try to find another place to operate. Not that it makes it right to do so....
 
The thousands (millions?) of dollars given to the organized crime syndicate... What do you think this did for the Colombian economy? The poisons that ran off the 1000s of acres of monocropped bananas (devastating biodiversity and poisoning the rural poor)? The synthetic fertilizers that caused the cultural eutrophication of lakes and rivers? The deforestation to get the whole operation going in the first place? Oh, but they paid a couple people a few pesos to be exposed to mutagenic biocides (and carry it home on their cloths for their families to enjoy). Those pesos feed the now cancer ridden family.

Almost forgot! What about all the local bananas that could no longer be sold at the local markets, because the industrial ones are so much cheaper. Does the destruction of the local market get quantified in "affects on economy"? Do any of the environmental factors? At least we should quantify the death and destruction caused directly by the payments made to mobsters.

I think it is painfully obvious who is benefiting from the Chiquita banana machine: chiquita and mobsters. And we think it could be bad for the Colombian economy if they left?

In the short term, yes, I think it would be a blow to the Columbian economy to lose such a big spender in their country. In the long term, however, you are probably right: environmental degradation and potential healthcare losses in the future would probably outweigh the cost of getting banana plantations out.
 
No matter. If Chiquita upped and left, I'm sure taxpayers would ride to the rescue with aid to the Colombian government.
 
Nanas is good for uuu

I love 'em.
 
The issue that seems to be mostly ignored here is whether any of those payments were actually pro-active instead of reactive, which is Chiquita's claim but isn't necessarily accurate.

In other words, the question is if any payment was made not in response to an extortion or threat but in order to accomplish something, such as murders or intimidation of union leaders, which also occurred at the time and which have also been documented.

Just something for you guys to think about, nothing more.

My country is screwed up. :(

(If I was Chiquita, I'd move out of there.)
Screwed up it may be in comparison to most of the countries represented here, but I wouldn't be so absolute.

They could try setting up operations elsewhere in the same country, take enough legitimate security measures and actually try treating their workers better for a change...you know, something not that hard to do.
 
Paying off guerillas for safety is only going to convince them to ask for more each and every time.
 
I don't see how the U.S is entitled to any many here.
 
Top Bottom