I see 2 possible positives of trying to incite a war without initiating:
1) You might actually get the tribute demand.
2) If/when you go to war, you don't get to choose where/when but you get all the HUGE defensive bonuses built into the game.
I'm up against Shaka with a tech lead against him. He has 2 vassals which are both weak/far behind. But given the enormous border I'm thinking of just centralizing my army, demanding at every turn, widening the tech gap while maintaining some flow of units, and moving units in proportion to where his own army goes, expecting an eventual war call.
If nothing happens (very unlikely given its shaka) I initiate at tanks and bombers. Right now we're just before cavalry.
I've never done anything like this though (usually I'm scrambling to churn out units after being caught off guard).
Is this a viable strategy? If not, what would you do different?
1) You might actually get the tribute demand.
2) If/when you go to war, you don't get to choose where/when but you get all the HUGE defensive bonuses built into the game.
I'm up against Shaka with a tech lead against him. He has 2 vassals which are both weak/far behind. But given the enormous border I'm thinking of just centralizing my army, demanding at every turn, widening the tech gap while maintaining some flow of units, and moving units in proportion to where his own army goes, expecting an eventual war call.
If nothing happens (very unlikely given its shaka) I initiate at tanks and bombers. Right now we're just before cavalry.
I've never done anything like this though (usually I'm scrambling to churn out units after being caught off guard).
Is this a viable strategy? If not, what would you do different?