1. We have added the ability to collapse/expand forum categories and widgets on forum home.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. All Civ avatars are brought back and available for selection in the Avatar Gallery! There are 945 avatars total.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. To make the site more secure, we have installed SSL certificates and enabled HTTPS for both the main site and forums.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Civ6 is released! Order now! (Amazon US | Amazon UK | Amazon CA | Amazon DE | Amazon FR)
    Dismiss Notice
  5. Dismiss Notice
  6. Forum account upgrades are available for ad-free browsing.
    Dismiss Notice

Events Exploit

Discussion in 'Team Cavaleiros' started by Earthling, Mar 8, 2009.

  1. Earthling

    Earthling Chieftain

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2008
    Messages:
    8,518
    Hi, I'd like to bring up the issue of the exploit discovered by the Mad Scientists related to events in this game. Daveshack has asked for a team vote and AFAIK we haven't discussed this at all. Basically the issue is that a team can "cancel" any event they get by ctl-alt-del or similar methods. What has been proposed, since the opinion of some teams is that nothing can be enforced otherwise, are the following:

    1) Teams must take their events and the turnplayer handles them (not popular among anyone from discussion, because it is felt that "cheating" will still happen)

    2) Teams only take positive events and cancel negative ones (Saturn recently endorsed this).

    3) All events must be canceled; no events will be acted on (I personally favor this, again I have no clue what the rest of the team thinks).

    So it looks like other teams are voting to only allow positive events, but discussion died down a while ago and there was no conclusion. I am very strongly against (2) because I feel events are imbalanced in the first place, and this solution does nothing for events one team gets that harm the other team. As I was mentioning to Lord Parkin, a vote for "Events" as the teams originally had is not the same as "only positive events" in my eyes at least. Losing the element of risk and still not knowing what all events can be canceled (like partisans for razing cities, uprisings, "wounded soldier peace"...) makes this solution seem rather poor to me. It's at least as any to enforce no events, period, too.

    But it would be nice if the team had more input on this, at the very least we should respectfully put forward a vote like the other teams so the issue can be resolved.
     
  2. Unconquered Sun

    Unconquered Sun Chieftain

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2006
    Messages:
    1,404
    Isn't 3) about as hard to enforce as 1) if there's cheating?
     
  3. Earthling

    Earthling Chieftain

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2008
    Messages:
    8,518
    Nope, AFAIK if an event happens it's recorded in the log, don't think teams can erase another team's log so it could easily be reported (or at the very least by an honest player on the same team).

    Edit: I think with any solution we're still going to have a lot of teams complaining about misclicks, at least for a while - "someone tried" to take an option or cancel it or whatever and something still happens. The problem that I brought up before is we still don't even know what events can be "canceled," or if how often the game would crash (in this case especially (1) may be a lot easier, but teams would complain about unfairness).
     
  4. Munro

    Munro Deity

    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    1,152
    Location:
    San Francisco
    Checking logs and trying to police either (1) or (3) sounds like a pain.

    I'd vote for (2) - teams can accept or cancel whichever events they want (and are able) to; it gives the same rules to all teams and requires no enforcing.

    As long as the rules are fair to all and have no in-built bias to any particular team (including no bias against honest teams ;)) then that's probably the most pragmatic (and fairest) approach.

    Then we just all make a note to try the 'ctrl-alt-delete' trick if we get an unfavourable event pop-up as the turnplayer.
     
  5. Diamondeye

    Diamondeye So Happy I Could Die

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    6,527
    Location:
    Dancing in the Dark
    I can only see 2 happening.
     
  6. Methos

    Methos HoF Quattromaster Super Moderator Hall of Fame Staff

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2005
    Messages:
    13,100
    Location:
    Missouri
    I tend to agree. Enforcing the others would be difficult. I vote 2.
     
  7. Renata

    Renata homicidal jungle cat GOTM Staff

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2003
    Messages:
    7,690
    Location:
    NY
    Has to be 2, though really, everyone should should just have accepted the wisdom of the Cavaleiros in the first place and kept events off. :p
     
  8. Niklas

    Niklas Fully Functional GOTM Staff

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2004
    Messages:
    10,290
    Location:
    57°47'55"N 12°09'16"E
    What Renata said. :lol:
     
  9. oyzar

    oyzar Have quit civ/forums

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    6,923
    Location:
    Norway
    ^^^^^^^^^^
     
  10. Earthling

    Earthling Chieftain

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2008
    Messages:
    8,518
    You know, we actually voted for events on...:lol:

    (I was in the dissenting minority - I prefered barbarians... but then the other teams' majority got barbs on too).
     
  11. TheMeInTeam

    TheMeInTeam GiftOfNukes

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2008
    Messages:
    22,122
    Location:
    Orlando
    I wonder if there's any doubt about how I feel about events these days...

    Well...3.
     
  12. Renata

    Renata homicidal jungle cat GOTM Staff

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2003
    Messages:
    7,690
    Location:
    NY
    Did we really? I thought it was barbs, but no events; guess it was the other way around. Okay, the wisdom of the Cavaleiros' wiser members, then. :D
     
  13. KingMorgan

    KingMorgan Chieftain

    Joined:
    May 6, 2008
    Messages:
    2,327
    Location:
    In the clouds
    yep number 2
     
  14. Earthling

    Earthling Chieftain

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2008
    Messages:
    8,518
    Anyone want to post in the main forum then that our team endorses option 2? - namely, teams are free to ignore events they don't like and handle events they do however they see fit. If anyone objects say so here, if not by tomorrow I'd guess we have a consensus.
     
  15. Niklas

    Niklas Fully Functional GOTM Staff

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2004
    Messages:
    10,290
    Location:
    57°47'55"N 12°09'16"E
    I think we are agreed. I'll go post our decision.
     

Share This Page