If the US is paying 8% more of its GDP for healthcare than Canada is, then even a 50% efficiency would free up 4% of GDP for the green deal, and would effectively mobilize the country in protecting the future.
Some people are okay with mobilization when it comes to preventing an external threat such as Nazi . But they don't use the same mindset when it's "consumption-caused extinction". The eroding of natural resources is the same as having them seized, from the viewpoint of those losing the resources.
The point is that it's 'obviously' affordable. All it would require is retasking of people from one useless activity (whatever that 8% of GDP represents that currently barely benefits everyone) to a useful activity.
Given that the 8% is a net loss, other than the benefits of employment and consumption, nearly any retasking will provide a net benefit.
Some people are okay with mobilization when it comes to preventing an external threat such as Nazi . But they don't use the same mindset when it's "consumption-caused extinction". The eroding of natural resources is the same as having them seized, from the viewpoint of those losing the resources.
The point is that it's 'obviously' affordable. All it would require is retasking of people from one useless activity (whatever that 8% of GDP represents that currently barely benefits everyone) to a useful activity.
Given that the 8% is a net loss, other than the benefits of employment and consumption, nearly any retasking will provide a net benefit.
Last edited: