Expectations of G&K?

Discussion in 'Civ5 - General Discussions' started by Yaksha, May 7, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Yaksha

    Yaksha Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Messages:
    10
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    Hello,

    Apologies if there's a better place / already a thread for this, had a look around and couldn't see any.

    I've been playing Civ IV for ages now, and have been thinking of getting into V but motivation hasn't been very high, considering the myriad issues users here have noted with the gameplay. It seems the vast majority of users consider V a backwards step.

    So I'm wondering, with all the details that have now been released for G&K, are people expecting it to address the bulk of the problems? Or will IV likely still be better?
     
  2. NotSure

    NotSure King

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2011
    Messages:
    712
    I'm expecting G&K to be awesome. There's still some bugs they've never fixed right and some have problems with resource demands, turn times, etc. I like the game and I'm glad it's being improved. There's been a few opportunities to get CiV cheap. Maybe you should just get the base game and decide for yourself?
     
  3. smallfish

    smallfish Immortal

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2011
    Messages:
    2,968
    A lot more awesome naval invasions by the AI. A lot more awesome mega-alliances that will have its frictions (occasional denouncements of the other party) but generally stay a whole lot more closer as time goes by. Major gameplay changes that still allows me to put a man into orbit (Satellites) before I've researched Atomic Theory or Penicillin.
     
  4. The_Quasar

    The_Quasar King

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2010
    Messages:
    862
    There is a whole section for G&K
    This was immediately after the release... most of the issues have long since been sorted, and the vast majority now consider V much better, and IV rather dated, with poorer graphics and gameplay.
    As I said previously, the bulk of the problems have long since been addressed... V will only get better and better, IV will look more and more dated, and SoD, fortunately, will get forgotten, and fall into the failed experiment bracket.
     
  5. leif erikson

    leif erikson Game of the Month Fanatic Administrator Supporter GOTM Staff

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2003
    Messages:
    27,481
    Location:
    Plymouth, MA
    Civ IV and Civ V are different games with differing design philosophies. Civ V was not intended to be super Civ IV, and was designed accordingly.

    Whether one is better than another will be in the eyes of the person that plays it. In many ways they are not comparable. Numerous patches have improved Civ V's game play, but some would argue that certain mechanics of the game are overpowered and need some more balance.

    G&K has some interesting new additions and you can read more in this forum and decide for yourself whether it is worth a try.

    edit - We decided to close this thread and ask that you do some reading in the G&K forum. :)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page