I don't disagree that one may think that there are more than one truth gathering devices and say that he believes logic to be nothing. If he is able of discussion , in an active discussion about this it will be almost impossible not to contradict himself. Well i ask what logical process he did use and require that he attempts to explain it. When one attempts to explain something he attempts to use at least partially logical phrases to make sense. Some of it is not logical but i believe that a part of it is. For example. Let's say he says Fate. I ask why ? And if his answer is not Faith again that Faith is the best method , or randomness then he must use atleast some kind of logic. The problem at being against all logical thought is that you can't have any kind of discussion. If you keep on discussing and not repeating constantly . It was random. It was faith , at one point you will attempt to explain something using logic because you believe logic is the best way to explain it. For example Chritians say that Jesus did good things. How did he do good things ? They may say because the bible say it is a good thing but almost everyone will claim that Healing the injured is a good thing , for example. Why , because they are people suffering , and can't contribute in society or to their families. Suffering also causes sad emotions to them and to their family. Humans can be empathetic so we like it when injured are healed. Society and families are important for us for reasons that can again be logically explained.That is a logical conclusion which you would not reach by faith because it is far easier to understand it by using logic. If that fails i can ask him about what is his opinion on Hitler. If he denys to answer i will ask him why. If he says that is irrelevant to the discussion and the rules of this site claim that only relevant discussions should take place. I assume he also means that we must obey the rules because if we don't there would be punishments and that discussing new subjects while you are already discussing one , is annoying because you end a discussion with another person without his agreement that he wants to change subject , or that his points where answered. It is almost impossible to not use logic to reach a verifiable conclusion even if you use also other methods.