That wasn't the original point I was disputing--this is:
If the Saka are one among many Scythian groups, then "Scythian Saka Horse Archer" is not the same as "Scythian Scythian Horse Archer". Rather, the Saka are a (more specific) subset of the Scythians, such that "Saka" doesn't mean the same as "Scythian" just as "Mangudai" doesn't just mean "Mongolian" even if the Mangghud can be counted among the Mongolian people. So no, the "Saka" are not just "Scythian"
especially in the modern understanding (for it was ancient peoples like the Persians who conflated the Saka with the Scythians).
You will have to be more specific about the offensive religion/racial angle. The page I linked specifically talked about Herodotus, Strabo and others, and didn't contain a map. Namely, the page I linked to was this one:
http://zoroastrianheritage.blogspot.com/2015/07/herodotus-references-to-saka.html?m=1
As it has specific citations and analysis, I will trust this page (and Wikipedia's) over any weird conclusory statements arguments that somehow the Saka and Scythians are exactly the same and thus redundant. They aren't. Even if the Saka can be counted among a larger Scythian group.
So no, a Scythian Saka Horse Archer is not redundant (ala "Scythian Scythian Horse Archer"). Nor is "Mongolian Mangudai" the same as "Mongolian Mongolian".
A better argument that there is weird redundancy can be made for the "Black Army Army" of Hungary.