1. We have added a Gift Upgrades feature that allows you to gift an account upgrade to another member, just in time for the holiday season. You can see the gift option when going to the Account Upgrades screen, or on any user profile screen.
    Dismiss Notice

First city: ever move off a river to a hill?

Discussion in 'Civ5 - General Discussions' started by Artifex1, May 11, 2014.

  1. Artifex1

    Artifex1 Warlord

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Messages:
    284
    Is this a mistake generally speaking? or a good thing?

    I love hills for some reason :)
     
  2. joncnunn

    joncnunn Senior Java Wizard Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    8,621
    Location:
    Missouri
    Yup; generally a mistake to move away from a river: Water Mill is a second granary which allows another citizen relocated to a mined hill.
     
  3. Crafty Bison

    Crafty Bison King

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2012
    Messages:
    756
    Might have seen it around GnK time when the rules were different (notably early AI was much more aggressive, and ICS was still possible), but now the extra hammer isn't necessarily better than the windmill alone, and that's not even considering all the river bonuses. Stick to the river if at all possible.
     
  4. TractorBoy

    TractorBoy Prince

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2012
    Messages:
    435
    Location:
    England
    Sometimes through moving onto a hill you can end up with more workable river tiles!
     
  5. joncnunn

    joncnunn Senior Java Wizard Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    8,621
    Location:
    Missouri
    Offset by losing water mill; and if city isn't coastal losing trade income.
     
  6. Vitruvius

    Vitruvius King

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2013
    Messages:
    862
    And lose gardens.

    Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
     
  7. TractorBoy

    TractorBoy Prince

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2012
    Messages:
    435
    Location:
    England
    There was no mention of coastal in the original post, could be that moving on to a hill gives you a coastal start. I have seen situations where workable river tiles could increase from six to as many as fourteen with a meandering river, you would hardly miss having to build a watermill or even a garden in such a case. I personally think there is to much emphasis put on river starts!
     
  8. notyourtypical

    notyourtypical Warlord

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2013
    Messages:
    119
    I prefer a capital with freshwater for the garden, so I'd prefer the river, all things being equal. If there are bonus resources or luxeries to be had, I could be swayed, but it would take 3 salt to convince me to give up the river. River cities get a second nice boost at electricity, too; provided you have 5 or 6 river tiles.
     
  9. Primacide

    Primacide Settler

    Joined:
    May 2, 2014
    Messages:
    602
    Location:
    California
    I'm with tractorboy, but out of sheer laziness. There always seems to be ten things I need to build or buy before water mills and gardens. Course I'm so lazy, I never move the settler. "Looks good to me... Let's do this."
     
  10. reddishrecue

    reddishrecue Deity

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2009
    Messages:
    5,376
    That's a 50/50 chance for me. I have moved to a hill but the settler doesn't always have to stay on the river.
     
  11. TractorBoy

    TractorBoy Prince

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2012
    Messages:
    435
    Location:
    England
    We are all pretty much aware of the three luxes within the three tile radius. If after you have moved your warrior all three have become visible and you are not to keen on what you see, this is the time to take a chance and move your settler on to a hill towards the fog, who knows you might just come across marble within your three tile radius!
     
  12. happyturtle

    happyturtle Mrs GrumpyOldCivver

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    860
    I caught myself putting cities on hills until it finally clicked with me that it was Civ IV behaviour. That hill might make the difference between surviving a barb invasion or not. Now that cities are more robust, it isn't as important to have a hill city for defence.
     
  13. MarauderCH

    MarauderCH Warlord

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2012
    Messages:
    282
  14. Halcyan2

    Halcyan2 Emperor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2012
    Messages:
    1,380
    Assuming all else is equal, then I generally value river access over being on a hill.

    River access gives you Watermill, Garden, and Hydro Plant. Also gives you a trade bonus with trade routes. Has a minor defensive bonus against melee attacks (from one side). You probably have more river tiles (for irrigated farms). And though not popular, you have Sacred Waters as a viable religious belief.

    Hillside gives you an extra hammer every turn. You also have a higher combat strength, and better vantage point for ranged units that are garrisoned. Disadvantage is that you cannot have Windmills.

    Rivers win over hills in most circumstances.

    Maybe if you are next to aggressive AI's, then you will want the stronger defensive capabilities of a hill. Or if Austria, your Coffee House can be built even on a hill.
     
  15. candle86

    candle86 Prince

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2007
    Messages:
    331
    It depends, I've moved to a hill from a river when I started in the jungle lol.
     
  16. Tabarnak

    Tabarnak Cut your lousy hairs!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2010
    Messages:
    5,968
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Québec
    I will let down a river for a hill if i go for a domination game or when i'm sure to get Hanging Gardens. Of course i also need to have a better spot overall.
     

Share This Page