PhilBowles
Deity
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2011
- Messages
- 5,333
Green on red is used by the Ottoman Janissaries in Jadwiga's scenario. I'm assuming they would save that for them. Also red on green would have to go to Ethiopia.
Why is there so much focus on colours? Only Civ V strongly tied civ colours to national colours - in Civ VI they seem to have started doing more of that (even to the extent of changing Australia's) but many of the colour selections still seem to be more or less chosen at random.
From Ed: Flower of Scotland: Will not attack neighbors unless they break a promise to him. Likes those who do not war with neighbors, dislikes those who do.
Are these leader behaviours linked to agendas a new thing with the expansion? I heard something on one of the streams about each AI now having an 'AI preference', which is hopefully a sign that the civs will be displaying more personality from now on - and hopefully more consistency with their own agendas.
The question is: do we even need the Celts as a civ at all? It is just a blob civ, like the Vikings and the Polynesians. I am glad Civ V got rid of the Vikings, and now Civ VI got rid of the Celts. Hopefully, we will get Hawaii and/or the Maori instead of Polynesia later on. If you want Celts, a Gaul civ would be an option, as well as a semi-blob Briton civ led by Boudicca.
They were never needed in the first place - the Celts are an artifact culture, not a coherent civilisation, and their broad relevance on the scale of a game like Civ is questionable. There's no reason they should ever have been in the game. That hasn't stopped them being in every version since Civ II. My concern is that Scotland doesn't rule out bringing them back - only Civ V even had a strong Scottish component to the city list, so they could come back in fully blobby form with very few changes.