Mastreditr111
Prince
And Do Not Feed Me Some Line About Prejudice Nd Racism!!!!!!!!!!!!! It Is Bulls**t!!!
Mastreditr111 said:There is NO undisabled person in this country who doesn't have a chance to ascend to at least middle-class, if they work hard for it. Welfare should, thus, logically be restricted to people with physical or mental disabilities that prevent them from working and earning a living.
Mastreditr111 said:There is NO undisabled person in this country who doesn't have a chance to ascend to at least middle-class, if they work hard for it. Welfare should, thus, logically be restricted to people with physical or mental disabilities that prevent them from working and earning a living.
Mastreditr111 said:2. dutch- America... duh... really it isnt that hard, for all that people complain, to pull yourself from poverty here, by getting an education. You will probably spend a long time paying off loans unless you are truly brilliant, or lucky, enough to get scholarships, but so what, you will be able to afford it with the income of a middle-class family.
tomsnowman123 said:A lot of the people who wish to legalize marijuana tend to have more liberal views on health care, i.e., the green party. It's a more liberal view, and liberals tend to stand for social freedoms. Marijuana is banned in the US because the Republican party party is in control, and not all liberals support it yet. Hopefully one day, it will be legal.
IglooDude said:But you see, that's the problem - those that want to keep marijuana illegal would have a very popular reason to do so. "You don't have an absolute right to do whatever you want to your own body, because I am paying the doctors' bills for your body."
And "I" in the case above am a raging religious right fundy - do you want the 50% of the electorate that voted for Dubya to be deciding what you can do with your body, because they pay for half of it now?
Mastreditr111 said:Dutch: i know the slums are horrible... but anyone, regardless of adversity, can still succeed... they will have to work hard. The myth that the slums cripple people for life is true, but only in so far as they gain a sense of entitlement, from welfare, and it is vastly exaggerated because very few people acutally bother to work hard enough to get out. Have you ever driven through a slum in America? I have, and can honestly say that about 40% of the households in those i have seen have $30-40,000 vehicles. So many people have their priorities so screwed up that they buy a car before moving away from the violence. This is the true fruit of government "social programs."
RedWolf said:Poor people don't pay taxes? Really? They do in my country... less then rich people of course if you're talking income tax... More (proportionately) if you're talking sales taxes...
Mastreditr111 said:Dutch: i know the slums are horrible... but anyone, regardless of adversity, can still succeed... they will have to work hard. The myth that the slums cripple people for life is true, but only in so far as they gain a sense of entitlement, from welfare, and it is vastly exaggerated because very few people acutally bother to work hard enough to get out. Have you ever driven through a slum in America? I have, and can honestly say that about 40% of the households in those i have seen have $30-40,000 vehicles. So many people have their priorities so screwed up that they buy a car before moving away from the violence. This is the true fruit of government "social programs."
tomsnowman123 said:Marijuana doesn't have to be all bad. I am talking about giving people the means to have medical care, which everyone should have. I don't see many conservatives trying to ban cigarette because they generate so much tax money. They are unhealthy. What if we taxed marijuana purchasing, would that make things better?
As to your second point, I know I am usually in the minority. But as of right now, half of our population does not support Bush.
The thing is, in the UK at least, that the poorer you are the higher proportion of your income you are likely to spend on tobacco, petrol and alcohol, and these are taxed so heavily that you are likely to be paying far more in tax than someone on a high income.MobBoss said:You must have a minimum income level (I forget how high) in order to have to pay federal income tax. If you make under that, you dont pay or you get a total refund when tax day comes around.
Samson said:The thing is, in the UK at least, that the poorer you are the higher proportion of your income you are likely to spend on tobacco, petrol and alcohol, and these are taxed so heavily that you are likely to be paying far more in tax than someone on a high income.
I was not commenting on the right or wrong of these people choose of how to spend their money. I was comenting on your statement that poor people did not pay tax.MobBoss said:Then maybe they should stop smoking, buy a bike and stop drinking stout as opposed to buying the necessities to survive.
The sort of tax you just mentioned is totally voluntary...a sin tax if you will. No one is forcing them to buy those goods.
Samson said:I was not commenting on the right or wrong of these people choose of how to spend their money. I was comenting on your statement that poor people did not pay tax.
Mastreditr111 said:Dutch: i know the slums are horrible... but anyone, regardless of adversity, can still succeed... they will have to work hard. The myth that the slums cripple people for life is true, but only in so far as they gain a sense of entitlement, from welfare, and it is vastly exaggerated because very few people acutally bother to work hard enough to get out. Have you ever driven through a slum in America? I have, and can honestly say that about 40% of the households in those i have seen have $30-40,000 vehicles. So many people have their priorities so screwed up that they buy a car before moving away from the violence. This is the true fruit of government "social programs."
A careful comparison reveals that the USA and Britain are at the bottom with the lowest social mobility. Norway has the greatest social mobility, followed by Denmark, Sweden and Finland. Germany is around the middle of the two extremes, and Canada was found to be much more mobile than the UK.
IglooDude said:On the flip side, there are liberals that want the government to make our lives as safe and as healthy as humanly possible - these are the ones bringing tobacco/fastfood lawsuits, calling for the regulation of pretty much everything, and insisting that the police and courts know what's best for us.