G20 meeting, April 2nd

A deal appears to have been reached

BBC

Leaders of the world's largest economies will shortly announce an agreement worth around $1.1 trillion to tackle the global financial crisis.

To help countries with severe problems, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) will get extra resources worth up to $750bn (£510bn).

In addition, there will be a deal at the G20 summit to "name and shame" countries that breach free-trade rules.

There will also be sanctions against secretive tax havens.

A member of the German delegation told the BBC's reporter Joe Lynam that the G20 will pledge $1.1tn for multilateral organisations such as the IMF.


An official announcement will be made soon, but leaders are expected to announce measures in the following key areas:

• IMF boost: The resources of the International Monetary Fund, the emergency lender for countries in financial trouble, will be expanded by $750bn. Its coffers have been depleted in recent months by having to help a number of Eastern European nations

The G20 nations are expected to agree to lend it an extra $500bn. In addition, leaders will also agree significant changes that will in effect create an overdraft facility worth $250bn (in the IMF's currency, so-called Special Drawing Rights) that the world's poorest countries can call on

• Tax havens: Treasury minister Stephen Timms says the G20 have agreed to impose sanctions on tax havens that refuse to sign up to OECD rules to fight money laundering and tax evasion, although discussions are continuing over whether unco-operative havens will be named and shamed

• Global trade: There will be about $250bn committed to boost international trade, UK Chancellor Alistair Darling confirmed. The figure will include national efforts already announced

• Fiscal stimulus: No new money will be pledged. However, leaders are expected to pledge to do whatever it takes to boost their own economies and emphasise that - globally - $2 trillion is already being spent to tackle the global recession

• Protectionism: There will be a commitment to naming and shaming countries that breach free trade rules

• Financial regulation: Tighter limits on the financial system are expected, including the activities of hedge funds, which are currently unregulated investment funds

• Bankers: There may also be measures to clamp down on bankers' pay.

According to the BBC's diplomatic correspondent James Robbins, the agreement will mark a very substantial shift towards control and regulation of capitalism.

It does imply that business will be done in a very significantly different way in the future, he says.

Disagreements

Earlier, UK Business Secretary Lord Mandelson told the BBC there were still some issues to iron out.


Darling: Progress made on trade
"[Disagreements] persisted overnight," Lord Mandelson told the BBC News channel, particularly over levels of funding for the IMF, regulation of tax havens and measures to boost global trade.

It is understood that Gordon Brown wants to go further than some other leaders on these matters.

"Our Prime Minister is excessively ambitious in what he wants out of this summit," UK Business Secretary Lord Mandelson said. "A good thing too, because there's absolutely no point in people just coming here and rehearsing old arguments restating old commitments."

Leaders started the crucial day of talks with a working breakfast, and before beginning what one minister described as "lively discussions", posed for a team photo.

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper missed it when he was pulled aside by an aide. When the photo was re-taken, however, the Italian Prime Minister, Silvio Berlusconi, was absent.

Protests

Protesters gathered outside the summit, but in smaller numbers than Wednesday's demonstrations in London's financial district where one man died and 86 people were arrested.

By mid-afternoon on Thursday, that total had risen to 111, the Metropolitan police said.

Several hundred staged "noisy but calm" protests near the Excel centre representing groups including the Stop the War Coalition and CND, the BBC's Ben Brown said.

A small group of protesters gathered earlier at the London Stock Exchange, but have since dispersed.

Further protests at G20 summit

'Balancing act'



Security tight for G20 summit
The final agreement will not be the end of the process, BBC chief economics correspondent Hugh Pym warns. "The G20 will need to meet again."

He says the leaders will have a difficult balancing act in presenting the final agreements later on Thursday.

There will have to be a bit of pragmatism over what can and cannot be achieved, our correspondent says, but they must also convey a sense that they really have a vision as to how they can bring economies through this recession.

The recession has worsened since G20 leaders met last November in Washington.

Both the IMF and the World Bank expect the world economy to shrink for the first time in decades this year.

Reporting from from the Excel centre, BBC business correspondent John Moylan said the summit would be judged a success if the global recession became a short, sharp shock, rather than a very long downturn.

The G20 group of nations is made up of the world's most powerful economies, accounting for 90% of the world's economic output, 80% of world trade and two-thirds of the world's population.
 
Now we've got Obama, Brown, and Sarko teamed up to destroy free markets. [...] :rolleyes:
Is that smiley to indicate sarcasm? Because sarcasm is pretty much the only way I can take that sentence and still make sense of it.
 
Look like pretty much everyone was wrong in saying thta they wouldnt agree anything. I wonder will it work, the markets certaintly seem to think so. how long before there are indicators to show if its working or not?
 
Yeah, it looks like they've agreed to a great deal, and have successfully avoided getting bogged down in details of the financial regulation etc.

The markets are stupid and will fall tomorrow </crystal ball>
 
I want to be also donated.
 
Obama = I want for sitmulus.... No

Sarkozy =
- I want somethihng against tax haven.... Ok
- I want more regulation.... OK
- I want something for banker income.... OK

Sarkozy 3 - Obama 0 :goodjob:

It seems the Franco-German team still holds some influence
 
You and the extreme left are two sides of the same coin. I am always surprised (and pleased) that you don't work together more often, like you did in the 30's.

That's the best you can say in defense of corrupted bankers, can't you?
 
Sarkozy rules both France and Germany now? :eek:

Also it looks like 1 tril more will be spent one way or the other so the yankees got something there.

I still need to see them agree on some details before I get my hopes up. "We need to do something about these issues" is all I hear them agreeing on.
 
Obama = I want for sitmulus.... No

Sarkozy =
- I want somethihng against tax haven.... Ok
- I want more regulation.... OK
- I want something for banker income.... OK

Sarkozy 3 - Obama 0 :goodjob:

It seems the Franco-German team still holds some influence

Didn't Sarco tell Obama(during the elections) that frenchies would have been happy with Obama presidency? Frenchies never change :mischief:
 
Sarkozy rules both France and Germany now? :eek:

The blond . .. .. .. .. . (Merkel) has a partiality for that french macho with a big hooked nose... oh well you have understood :goodjob:
 
Yea, you southeners do seem to prefer leaders with "playboy charm" and oily smiles. :lol: Good to see theres some substance to some of them as well. Hopefully it wont swell his head too much, or he'll decide to rename the weekdays or some such nonsense next. ;)
 
Uh, these are all things Obama also wants...
That's all the skill of Sarko... Get something that he wants and the others want, while giving the impression they did not want it, and they did not get what they said they wanted, and so he's the great winner.
 
meh, nevermind. it's too late and I'm tired...
 
The blond . .. .. .. .. . (Merkel) has a partiality for that french macho with a big hooked nose... oh well you have understood :goodjob:

That's uh a little OT...

But anyway, this summit doesn't look like it meant anything except a couple of news cycles devoted to it.
 
Now we've got Obama, Brown, and Sarko teamed up to destroy free markets. Hooray for us. :rolleyes:

Get ready for communism comrade :blush::blush::blush:
 
Top Bottom