Yeah, if 720,000 children get it, and there are 74.2 million kids in the US, then it is more like 99%.That's an interesting use of "90%."
From the original link:Are all those kids eligable?
That's an interesting use of "90%."
The people you are giving it to is people with kids. As someone without them, it totally seems like that is a class that is likely to need it.Jacobin is pretty reliably lying, or useless, from my experience. But yes - that's exactly the point. They're pumping a ****load of fiat into inflation, in a great percentage to people who do not need it, who will then bid out for goods the people who need it most, who aren't getting it. It's a real Biden ****job, near as I can tell.
Jacobin is pretty reliably lying, or useless, from my experience. But yes - that's exactly the point. They're pumping a ****load of fiat into inflation, in a great percentage to people who do not need it, who will then bid out for goods the people who need it most, who aren't getting it. It's a real Biden ****job, near as I can tell.
Oh dear, you said 'social'. That's communism.True, simply socializing child care would be a vastly superior option.
It's pretty social already, so it's not like that's a magic word that somehow changes reality.
You mean school is communism!!!No, socialized like how in the Soviet Union child care was free to anyone at government-run facilities.
hypocrisy?
say it aint so
when both are bad its extra bad for one to cast stones, so sayeth the lord
Challenge for you. Stop watching Fox news for a month or two. A year even better.
Avoid American news in general.
He watches youtube videos. I think Fox News would be a step up.