Geographic & Temporal Distribution of Leaders

[evonannoredars]

With all the discussion of the geographic distribution of the leaders, I was curious about the temporal distribution compared. As has been pointed out already, how I could've divided them up geographically is up for debate, although hopefully what I settled on is still sufficiently reflective of the geographical bias towards (west/central) European leaders.

Surprisingly, the temporal distribution is fairly even. Although it's ultimately not very important for gameplay besides providing options for which civs you can be in the Exploration and Modern eras, each era has about the same number of leaders from that era.
The temporal and geographic combinations are pretty odd however - Asia has exclusively Ancient leaders for instance.
If the leader distribution ends up being 7/7/7, then that means we'd be looking at one more Modern leader - and hopefully one that isn't European or non-indigenous North American!

 

[Glassmage]

The best measure for civ distribution should be during the Age of Exploration, because most of the popular civs were "alive" back then. Like in Civ5 has it pretty good

 

[Nic@Melbourne]

Australia deserves its 0 leaders.
-it might make the era 4 post modern expansion as a Civ.

 

[Krikkit1]

Australia deserves its 0 leaders.
-it might make the era 4 post modern expansion as a Civ.

I could see Maori as age 3…not sure of what Leaders they might have…but that starts Oceania instead of Australia route.