I'll take the Olmec speaking Mixe over more more post-colonial nations.Be careful what you wish for Zaarin dear boy. If we started having more dark horses than mainstays my dastardly plot to get The Olmec, Nigeria, and Nepal into civ may come to fruition! You’d have to find some way live with the knowledge that somewhere out there I, the Prince of Nigeria, got his way. However would you sleep at night knowing that a civ with a (GASP!) unattested language got into the game all because of your frivolous disregard for the Civ code of conduct? You wouldn’t! Nay, you couldn’t!
I'm betting someone in design and planning is explaining to legal and marketing why they went with the Cree instead of the Sioux or IroquoisGeorgia isn't the worst choice, far from it. I'd say Cree are much worse. Firaxis had so many North Amerindian tribes to pick from instead. Iroquois, though already included in a couple of previous iterations, would be a far better choice, for one, they actually built settlements, walled ones and (long)houses too.
Georgia is in because of a famous Female Great Leader for the most part. However, Georgia was never a world power. A highland/mounainous country, they get highland bonuses (Well done Firaxis!), Spiritual/Religious, and I'd say should have a rather a Tall/perfectionistic approach to expansion.
If it's any consolation, it's Friday.I really don't understand the hate for Georgia.
You misspelled "leaked".If it's any consolation, it's Friday.
If a new civ gets announced on-schedule, the Great Georgia Controversy will be a stale affair.
You misspelled "leaked".
My bet is this week will bring the Inca, under my theory that they are alternating new civs and civ staples.
You misspelled "leaked".
My bet is this week will bring the Inca, under my theory that they are alternating new civs and civ staples.
Even the Zulu over South Africa?I'll take the Olmec speaking Mixe over more more post-colonial nations.
Yes. I'm not thrilled with the inclusion of the Zulu, but I do recognize that there aren't a whole lot of options for the southern regions of Africa. If we need a civ to fill that gap, I will reluctantly take the Zulu over South Africa, not knowing the region well enough to suggest an alternative. The various Khoisan peoples are really interesting, but I don't exactly see them as "civ" material--they're among the few hunter/gatherer tribes left in the world today outside the Amazon.Even the Zulu over South Africa?
The Bachwezi!I'd prefer to see Ghana or Mali over Zulu.