1. We have added a Gift Upgrades feature that allows you to gift an account upgrade to another member, just in time for the holiday season. You can see the gift option when going to the Account Upgrades screen, or on any user profile screen.
    Dismiss Notice

Get rid of hexes

Discussion in 'Civ - Ideas & Suggestions' started by wiggawuu, Jun 5, 2017.

  1. wiggawuu

    wiggawuu Warlord

    Joined:
    May 25, 2016
    Messages:
    142
    Lets do octagons instead.
     
  2. Uberfrog

    Uberfrog Deity

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2007
    Messages:
    2,459
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    England
    I'm fairly sure you are already aware of the problem with that.

     
  3. Naokaukodem

    Naokaukodem Millenary King

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2003
    Messages:
    3,090
    Octagons = squares. Civ1, Civ2, Civ3, Civ4.
     
    Uberfrog likes this.
  4. TomKQT

    TomKQT Prince

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2010
    Messages:
    512
    There's one difference. On squares you have only 4 equal move directions (diagonals work differently and break the system a bit). On octagons you have 8 equal move directions, so it would be theoretically more variable than hexes and at the same time more logical and consistent than squares. But I think I must mention one very slight problem - you cannot build a 2D grid from octagons, it's mathematically not possible :D (There are octagons + squares on the image from Uberfrog, so it technically is NOT an octagon grid.)

    (Btw, I understood that this thread is a joke, but I think it's a nice idea to discuss anyway :) )
     
  5. Leyrann

    Leyrann Deity

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2015
    Messages:
    3,970
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Netherlands
    So basically octagons would then be squares without being allowed to move diagonally?
     
  6. Naokaukodem

    Naokaukodem Millenary King

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2003
    Messages:
    3,090
    As octagons can't be without squares inbetween, their moves can't be equal. It's the same than squares with diagonal moves.

    But you can do squares and forbidding diagonal moves, like in Advance Wars. (Nintendo)
     
  7. Leyrann

    Leyrann Deity

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2015
    Messages:
    3,970
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Of course a triangle grid would always be an opportunity. Not sure how equal that would make movement, though I suppose that you could only move over the sides, not over the edges (or you'd be able to move to 12 triangles from any triangle).
     
  8. Uberfrog

    Uberfrog Deity

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2007
    Messages:
    2,459
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    England
    Triangles have the problem that their orientations change between adjacent tiles. So you can move, say, north with your first movement point, but on the next tile, you'd have to move either northeast or northwest (or go back the way you came). This is quite unintuitive. Hexagons and squares feel much more natural, as unit paths wouldn't have to unnecessarily zig-zag like this.

    Squares are good in that they offer nice straight paths for each compass direction. However they do not preserve distance, making diagonal travel more efficient in a way that seems to break movement rules. It also makes your landmasses look very blocky.

    Hexagons are I think on balance the best possible choice. They are round enough that you can have more attractive map features, preserve equal distances in each available direction, and they offer intuitive straight paths in a good number of directions. The only thing that's slightly wonky is that you cannot directly travel east or west. But that's a reasonable trade-off for everything else, in my view. It also makes the adjacency bonuses that are key to Civ VI's design immediately clear in a way squares wouldn't (i.e. do diagonals count as adjacent?)

    Spoiler Triangular grid in all its wonky glory :

     

Share This Page