GM Nomination Thread
- Thread starter Splime
- Start date
Gaius Octavius
Deity
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2006
- Messages
- 4,016
It will take a while before we can get it going. Don't worry.
Perfection
The Great Head.
so tony what would you do as GM?
Splime
Regular Lurker
OK, so when we get the vote started, there will be two things to vote on: number of GMs (anywhere from 1 to 3), and your top 3 choices.
Splime
Regular Lurker
Please don't make a joke out of this. You've already seen the failures that were Abgar and Perf, and the controversy that was Provolution.
jeps
Arcadefire
LF, if you are serious, I would support you for GM.
If not, I dont exactly know how to finish this sentence.
I could always laugh at your meager 4.84 p/d compared to my 6.00 p/d.
but then it would seem that I care about pc.
If not, I dont exactly know how to finish this sentence.
I could always laugh at your meager 4.84 p/d compared to my 6.00 p/d.
but then it would seem that I care about pc.
jeps
Arcadefire
Then I support GO, Splime, and LF for GMs, and 3 GMs.
azzaman333
meh
I don't care who the GMs are provided that have the time to be a good one.
Perfection
The Great Head.
I think LightFang would do a good job, I'm hesistant to support Tony just because I don't really know him.
Japanrocks12
tired of being a man
LightFang has proved to be incredibly competent. I'll support LightFang.
Splime too
Splime too
Provolution
Sage of Quatronia
Please do not condemn me too much in aftermath, I am way different from Perf and Abgar.
I tried to work for the game, hard, I tried to compromise for a long time, until someone decided to flood the game with non-participant votes.
Perf was the source of both failure and controversy (at least Abgar did not assault my attempt), and we managed to turn the game around just before he fought his way back in (with the help of a flame choir), just to fold his hands again. He did not even bother to fix the factbook again, even though I posted what he needed in the thread.
Perfection has been the biggest problem, and I seriously hope you get rid of him as GM in all capacities. However, I am gone (but will comment if someone writes about me).
Gaius Octavius
Deity
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2006
- Messages
- 4,016
I know nothing about LightFang and therefore cannot make an accurate and fair assessment of LF's ability. However, the statement about being an "abrasive GM" does not induce confidence in me; if anything, it makes me more hesitant. We do not want a GM who'll create more conflict among the players. Maybe you were just being sarcastic, LF, but as somebody else said, please don't run if you're simply going to make a joke out of it.
Now, as for Tony, I similarly have trouble "reading" him. My experience has been that he is a very non-controversial person who quietly performs his duties without undue pomp or demands. In other words, he's someone you can count on to be fair and unbiased--the perfect balance in a triumvirate such as this.
Now, as for Tony, I similarly have trouble "reading" him. My experience has been that he is a very non-controversial person who quietly performs his duties without undue pomp or demands. In other words, he's someone you can count on to be fair and unbiased--the perfect balance in a triumvirate such as this.
I'd go for GO, Splime, and Tony.
GO, you'd be the first person to cut for me, not because I doubt your leadership ability (I don't), but, rather, I'd like to see you try to get the Conservatives up and running again.
Splime, I think anyone can agree with you.
Tony, I've see be non-biased, and I think he'd be a good choice.
GO, you'd be the first person to cut for me, not because I doubt your leadership ability (I don't), but, rather, I'd like to see you try to get the Conservatives up and running again.
Splime, I think anyone can agree with you.
Tony, I've see be non-biased, and I think he'd be a good choice.
Good for me: Read Gaius Octavius's aand Red Door's comments on this page.
Bad for me: My connection can occasionally be poor and I haven't GM'ed any games before.
I probably wouldn't create too many events, and would be more involved in organisation of existing info and dealing with parties and disputes instead of creating new events.
Gaius Octavius
Deity
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2006
- Messages
- 4,016
Well, I take that in the best of ways.
I don't know if I'm the best person to get the Conservatives going again, as they are often a diverse lot and I would likely be the most conservative among them, my "political compass" score notwithstanding.
From a different perspective, I suppose you could argue that they're more likely to come back if they feel "one of their own" is helping run the game, thereby averting allegations of a real-or-otherwise liberal bias and "mafia."
Well, I take that in the best of ways.
I don't know if I'm the best person to get the Conservatives going again, as they are often a diverse lot and I would likely be the most conservative among them, my "political compass" score notwithstanding.
From a different perspective, I suppose you could argue that they're more likely to come back if they feel "one of their own" is helping run the game, thereby averting allegations of a real-or-otherwise liberal bias and "mafia."
You should, it was a compliment.
And agreed with the above.Obviously, by telling everybody that I would be abrasive as a GM, I clearly think that having such qualities would be conductive to good GMing and that having that quality is an advantage. =/
Aren't I allowed to be a lil' sarcastic sometimes? I mean, sure, I'm seriously running for this, but come on, you and I both don't want abrasive GMs. Or do you?
Similar threads
- Locked
- Poll
