You say you live in Metro Detroit? The one time I was in Dearborn I barely heard anything outside of Arabic while I was in public.I wasn't offended by the ad at all, but I was confused. I have only watched it once, when it aired live, and my first reaction was, why are all these kids in different countries singing American the beautiful? You see, I didn't even realize they were supposed to be American's of different ethnic groups singing in their native languages. Aside from some spanish in the southwest, and gangster movies where you see old guys talking in italian, and maybe so and so's grandma who spoke polish or russian or whatever, where are you that you are exposed to these other languages on a regular basis? I like in a very diverse area (metro detroit) with a huge indian, asian and middle eastern population and still don't ever notice people speaking in arabic en mass for example. They might at home. They certainly wouldn't be singing pop songs in arabic in public. So it just seems weird to me all these kids were singing like this cus in reality it would never happen. It's a made up fairy tale by coke and kind of dumb. But not offensive.
As Steven Colbert pointed out, how can we possibly expect a Floridian who served in Iraq to know what Spanish and Arabic sound like?The tea party Republican who represented Broward and Palm Beach counties in Congress for one term took to his blog during the game on Sunday with his criticism. In a follow up blog post on Monday, he asked this question: “Coke’s ‘America the Beautiful’ or America the Balkanized?”
He wrote that he first thought he was watching a patriotic Coke commercial starting with the words to “America the Beautiful.”
“Then the words went from English to languages I didn’t recognize. Now, I know the politically correct thing is to foster multiculturalism — working really well in Europe — but we should remember the words spoken by President Teddy Roosevelt,” West wrote.
I think Coca-Cola is giving many people far too much credit.Here’s what the Coca-Cola company said on its website about the ad:
Near the end of the first half of Sunday's Big Game, Coca-Cola premiered “It’s Beautiful,” a 60-second salute to all Americans and the Coca-Cola moments they share.
Set to “America the Beautiful” sung by Americans in seven languages, the spot features scenes showcasing the country’s expansive landscapes -- from the Pacific shores to the desert Southwest -- interspersed with American neighborhoods, metro cityscapes and tucked-away cafes. “It’s Beautiful” was created to celebrate Coke moments among all Americans who together enjoy ice-cold, refreshing Coke. The ad provides a snapshot of the real lives of Americans representing diverse ethnicities, religions, races and families, all found in the United States.
“For 127 years, Coca-Cola has been proud to be a part of bringing friends and families together while memories are made,” said Katie Bayne, president, North America Brands, Coca-Cola North America. "With ‘It’s Beautiful,’ we are simply showing that America is beautiful, and Coke is for everyone.”
Bayne adds, “‘It’s Beautiful’ is exactly what Coca-Cola is all about: celebrating the diversity that makes this country great and the fact that anyone can thrive here and be happy. We hope the ad gets people talking and thinking about what it means to be proud to be American.”
I like this post quite a bit but I'm going to have to ask you to define public sentiment because what is an isn't included really affects the rest of the post.
edit: just saw your edit, it helps, but still curious.
I think I'm reading this wrongly. Your argument is public sentiment is generally the measuring stick of what opinions are winning out in a given moment? And that in itself has value? I would find that to be value-neutral ethically. More useful than valuable, if that makes sense. Or rather, are you making that case that public sentiment is a momentum augmentation to social/legal change? At which point I would definitely put the ethical value as neutral. In the context of that sort of argument I would say I watched sentiment's momentum make my country a far less noble place in some very important ways 2001 - present. I don't even think the pendulum has necessarily stopped swinging towards security instead of freedom since that fateful September when I was 20.
Forget earlier I think the following is more fun: I think it's intrinsically bad when public sentiment is letting itself by driven by a commercial ploy by coke. That you're letting coke drive it's brand in your mind as a part of your morality. It's literally seeking to further commodify your morality by marrying itself to your identity by staging an us-vs-them word volley.
I thought the Mexicans stole it from the Paiute? Who just happened on it, themselves, one day. While wandering around aimlessly.
According to the WhiteSupremacistsNationalists, though, it's the White Race who have made it what it is today.
So they're, quite rightly, keeping it. Thank you.
(I may have misunderstood. But I thought that's what they said.)
We should all share it.
That could mean almost anything, from noble to terrible.
Let's be clear, except for your judgment of "almost incidental", this is what I am saying. The thing is that it's not incidental. The reaction to various bigots is reflecting and advancing public sentiment but its done so by repeatedly referencing what brought about the debate, the coke ad.I think you need to be careful here. The Coke commercial and the public sentiment I'm referring to are not inherently linked. People are reacting the other people who expressed non-progressive sentiments in reaction to the commercial. The commercial is what sparked off this exchange, but it's also almost incidental to the debate that it brings attention to.
Loyalty to America is important to me. Otherwise I fear a similar fate as the Romans. (who's barbarians fighting in their military were not loyal to the Roam empire). Romans had plenty of immigration issues (from barbarian migration), and they probably did not handle it well.
It's like Pavlov's bell.Uh oh. WHer attack in 5...4...3...
The sentiment against the backlash reinforces the anti-antiist identity, but now refreshed by coke. Parasites on our psyche, man.
Here in 'Murica we speak English!
Let's be clear, except for your judgment of "almost incidental", this is what I am saying. The thing is that it's not incidental. The reaction to various bigots is reflecting and advancing public sentiment but its done so by repeatedly referencing what brought about the debate, the coke ad.
The sentiment against the backlash reinforces the anti-antiist identity, but now refreshed by coke. Parasites on our psyche, man.
General rule with place names: even if the place is named after somewhere else, the locals own the pronunciation of their landmarks/cities/streets/whatnot. Even if it's confusing, or "Kay-row" Illinois gives me the hives a little bit.