arkham4269
Court Writer - Orbis Mod
Not sure if this is the way to ask for things, but might I suggest that you fix the whole issue with nuclear weapons? I love how the mod does WWI to WWII to Cold War to Modern but what has always bugged me is that when it comes to nukes you go right to ICBMs!
First off, I believe that every nation should have to build a Nuclear weapon wonder to get nukes. As a 17 year Army intel analyst I can tell you that there is a major difference between having a technology like nuclear power from being able to weaponize it. (For that matter, how come no chemical weapons till far later in the game?)
So I think that at first you'd get 'atomic bombers' that would be the B-29 icon and would be one shot weapons since I think it would be easier than changing the bombers to carry weapons. Then you'd be able to develop tactical nukes to represent IRBMs and nuclear artillery. Only after that should you be able to develop ICBMs. I mean there was a 20 year gap between the A-Bomb and the ICBM. If you're going to go from the Sherman to the M-60, I think you need to have the same progression in nukes.
First off, I believe that every nation should have to build a Nuclear weapon wonder to get nukes. As a 17 year Army intel analyst I can tell you that there is a major difference between having a technology like nuclear power from being able to weaponize it. (For that matter, how come no chemical weapons till far later in the game?)
So I think that at first you'd get 'atomic bombers' that would be the B-29 icon and would be one shot weapons since I think it would be easier than changing the bombers to carry weapons. Then you'd be able to develop tactical nukes to represent IRBMs and nuclear artillery. Only after that should you be able to develop ICBMs. I mean there was a 20 year gap between the A-Bomb and the ICBM. If you're going to go from the Sherman to the M-60, I think you need to have the same progression in nukes.