I was going to ask for you to link cardgame's Godwin post you were referencing but I see you edited it to Rashiminos... However, you'll notice that I already discussed that post as well in the same post where I mentioned aelf's post. I suspected (and Rashiminos has confirmed) that he wasn't making a Godwin comparison. He was talking about modern-day homophobic people who are homophobic for eugenics reasons... And your post is before, aelf's...Margaret Sanger.
Rashiminos also brought up eugenics before me (post #210)
So we are back to you. Do you believe that Margaret Sanger invented eugenics, yes or no? If you do (or did when you posted #211) then you certainly can't be accused of a Godwin for that post... But... then you are clearly wrong and grossly misinformed on the subject. Also, your whole argument against liberals through the socialism comparisons fails... essentially the entire argument you have been making for the past 4 pages collapses because you based it on the erroneous belief that Margaret Sanger invented eugenics.
On the other hand, if you just lied about thinking Margaret Sanger invented eugenics to get out of the Godwin thing, then your overall argument might be salvageable (you should try to clarify the basis of your argument in that case) but... you're back on the Godwin podium.