And this isn't really accurate either:
It is NOT ludicrous. These groups, the Allawites, the Sunnis and the Shias do get together and cooperate with one another in order to fight a common enemy. Then, afterward, they go back to fighting one another. This happened in the fight between Afghanistan and Russia. It is also going on between the Syrians and Iranians in the support of Hezbollah against Israel, so let's not be disingenuous in order to make someone else look ignorant.
They do work together, and so from an American perspective, it doesn't matter that much. Yes, it is interesting to discover which groups have different views, but for the most part, the difference between Wahabbis and Salafists are infintesimal, and it is exaggeration to make it seem important. It isn't relevant when they are constantly shifting loyalties, don't mind ignoring their differences to fight a common enemy.
Ayman al Zawahiri is NOT a Wahabbi, he is an Egyptian Salafist, and yet he has been #2 loyal companion to OBL, and even married off his daughter to OBL's son. There is not that much difference. They both adhere to the Khalwaariji theory that says you can proclaim a Muslim a kafir and kill him if he does any compromising with a secular government. That is what happened to Ali, Mohammed's son in law. They killed him for negotiation with a kafir. That seems to be all that is important to them. They want to kill, kill, kill.
Quote:
That's fine for you to do so, but my focus is on those that do not.
Close enough; Syria actively supports terrorist groups like Hezbollah, is allied to Iran, and holds Syria's Jewish community hostage.
I don't care about nuances, I care about the Americans who are being murdered in the name of Islam.
Haha, this is the exact problem: how most Westerners are unable to intelligently view another peoples and their history, culture, and current affairs. This ignorance is blinding. It is ludicrous how you say "close enough" to the idea that Syria are Islamists when in fact they are Baathists. But I'm afraid that you can never truly appreciate how funny of a statement that is. I just told you that Baathists are the avowed enemies of Islamists, and yet you find it OK to group them together, lol. I think with your mentality, the idea of just nuking everyone who looks brown would be a tenable idea.
It is NOT ludicrous. These groups, the Allawites, the Sunnis and the Shias do get together and cooperate with one another in order to fight a common enemy. Then, afterward, they go back to fighting one another. This happened in the fight between Afghanistan and Russia. It is also going on between the Syrians and Iranians in the support of Hezbollah against Israel, so let's not be disingenuous in order to make someone else look ignorant.
They do work together, and so from an American perspective, it doesn't matter that much. Yes, it is interesting to discover which groups have different views, but for the most part, the difference between Wahabbis and Salafists are infintesimal, and it is exaggeration to make it seem important. It isn't relevant when they are constantly shifting loyalties, don't mind ignoring their differences to fight a common enemy.
Ayman al Zawahiri is NOT a Wahabbi, he is an Egyptian Salafist, and yet he has been #2 loyal companion to OBL, and even married off his daughter to OBL's son. There is not that much difference. They both adhere to the Khalwaariji theory that says you can proclaim a Muslim a kafir and kill him if he does any compromising with a secular government. That is what happened to Ali, Mohammed's son in law. They killed him for negotiation with a kafir. That seems to be all that is important to them. They want to kill, kill, kill.