The United Nations is broken in my honest opinion. A country uses chemical weapons, and the U.N. does nothing? If the U.N. can't do anything about such activity, what good is it? What do they even accomplish? Giving jobs to unskilled people? Seems to me that's all they do. The whole point the U.N. came into being with is to stop activities such as this. First of all the security council needs to be disbanded. No country should have this much power. This was a mistake from the outset. This was strictly a power move by western nations to have a grip on power. There should be a general vote to declare war on Syria, if 3/4 of the nations approve, then the nations that approved are mandated to declare war on Syria. You should not have 3 rogue nations (U.S., U.K., and France) going off on their own dictating their own justice. And for what? An attack that does almost no damage? Tomahawks aren't particularly effective. Just ask Bill Clinton in the 90's with his Wag the Dog attack that accomplished absolutely nothing against Al Quida. Most likely such a measure would have failed because Russia would threaten world war if Syria was attacked, but I really don't think Russia would risk annihilation over Syria. But I admit the risk of World War is there with my proposal. Even if the proposal failed, at least something was done other than talk, which it seems is all the U.N. does. So how would you fix the United Nations? Or do you think it's working?